===============
Disclaimer: this is a not an attack on anyone, this is a philosophy page. So, I am inspired in this way to express my philosophical thoughts. My thoughts on the post is as follows (but to not make disparaging thoughtless remarks because that is not my intent here. . . ) This is why we draw inspiration to postulate things of this nature. SO if you think I am not being serious, that's on you. DO NOT -shit post my take.
=============
June 5th 2026
(begins. . . )
I prefer to identify with the lamb. Metaphorically speaking, we all know Lions. But for every shallow type of lifeform, those that are not made to defend themselves, - there is a restitution to be paid for. My point is that those that fail to protect the lambs from being threatened as lambs. The Lions are rulers in defense of the lamb. (To know the lamb, is its inherent worth. The property of the lamb is symbolic of truth which is the cost to be made a Lion.)
(ends.)
- Marco
=====================
Please be experiencing as we go along, do not remain on the verbal level.
What is the relationship of the mind to what is? So far, the what is has been given a name, a term, a symbol of association, and this naming prevents direct relationship, which makes the mind dull, insensitive. The mind and what is are not two separate processes, but naming separates them. When this naming ceases, there is a direct relationship: the mind and the what is are one. The what is is now the observer himself without a term, and only then is the what is transformed; it is no longer the thing called emptiness with its associations of fear, and so on. Then the mind is only the state of experiencing, in which the experiencer and the experienced are not. Then there is immeasurable depth, for he who measures is gone. That which is deep is silent, tranquil, and in this tranquillity is the spring of the inexhaustible. The agitation of the mind is the usage of word. When the word is not, the measureless is.
J. Krishnamurti
Commentaries on Living
No comments:
Post a Comment