The most important characteristics about me are:
1- I am no mental whore to freedom. (corrupted model)
2 - I am no uneffeminate slave to reason. (passive aggressive)
3 - I know how to delegate unstable authority. (systematic)
My extended beliefs make up a greater circumference of ideals (i.e. detailing), to dream - dream my own reasons, so too become my unconscious civility, my unconscious civility then takes on a personal level of nature (a) am I living a lie (b) can I make wishful thoughts (c) an altered state in reality to create energy of a cerebral nature. Can my value in all things be invested into one thing, a secret value, a secretive nature.
My own sense of self (belief) pervades my self gratification of a superficial value. Therefore it is in all things superficiality is the most obvious form of misconduct.
Can I not fall out of favor with the universe. That seems as if an aggressive formality against myself inhibition, as opposed to the outside forces I trust are at work in my favor.
I am made not to understand things that operate in the same way the universe does, nor am I in a universe as everyone else imitates. This is the most conventional ideal of wisdom I can think of.
We are made 'not' to understand why things are the way they are, or why they happen as they do, this is my true belief of life.
Therefore, I am 'not' made.
I am passionate.
However, I am not made to do anything in particular. What I am simply is 'that'. This is in my definition of the universe, my ultimate wisdom at a distance, I ask myself (a) what (b) is (c) that. The 'what' is what I forfeit myself to. The 'how' is to ensure you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state or my satire in all of this.
In its effect: life is not a pursual to excellence.
The universe is not that powerful. I want to think this is a concept of the weakest version I myself would be able to survive it. This flies in the face of Darwin's survival of the fittest theory.
- Marco
=============
==============
This entry in it's entirety was truthfully trying to explain, how does one determine to answer, if there is one thing in the universe that is 'sacred', what would it be, how could it look like, what makes it permanent. Therefore, what then is my sacred right as an individual, myself taught, sacred to freedom.
I believe the truth in that answer, begins and ends in asking the question itself, what acts as sacred, the scared act to feel the truth. Is it even a possibility, in the way you ask a question has the nature of such a duality. What is sacred then what is reason. What 'is' sacred to reason.
That is the question one LEARNS to ask. You do not live as sacred, there is no nature in divinity, only divinity in nature can produce the divine will. This is what provides me, with the revealing of substantiation.
That what is sacred is a substantiation of my own will. That how you answer the question of what is sacred, can only then act as my divine will to answer it. It is the super self unconscious self. Can you live with yourself, in such a self described role, without the power to judge but of empowering the unconscious psyche that is my own minds eye - the eye of god, my eyes to gods will tells me.
==============
Can I testify myself to the will of god, then god would recognize me. How would I possibly know. This is the basis, of asking what is sacred. How do you possibly begin to ask yourself that question, let alone discern its answer.
===============
^The very nature of the divine will in action.
=============
"I am made, not to, understand things that operate in the same way the universe does, nor am I in a universe as everyone else imitates. This is the most conventional ideal of wisdom I can think of. " (MA2012)
If there was ever a way to inform the masses against its own unfavorable gestation, in the form of ignorance set free, this would be it.^
We live as a means to be sedated of free will, then free thought would radically be different to a cause.
===============
In every instance I inform myself, I believe in my truth to reason consequential to each moment a thought is born.
===============
"The universe is not that powerful. I want to think this is a concept of the weakest version I myself would be able to survive it. This flies in the face of Darwin's survival of the fittest theory."
If the universe acts as the single most viable creation known to man, the conceptualization we have of ourselves in it is our greatest misconception. We take for granted in each instance the universe if it were a creation man has deemed itself as the founder is a fatal flaw. Therefore even in evolutionary theory which aim is to disprove the theory of God's ad hoc existence means only the coefficient of evolution versus theology where man acts being the rational cause or choice of free will cannot be falsified.
===============
(Part I)
"However, I am not made to do anything in particular. What I am simply is 'that'. This is in my definition of the universe, my ultimate wisdom at a distance, I ask myself (a) what (b) is (c) that. The 'what' is what I forfeit myself to. The 'how' is to ensure you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state of my satire in all of this."
(Part II)
"That what is sacred is a substantiation of my own will. That how you answer the question of what is sacred, can only then act as my divine will to answer it. It is the super self unconscious self. Can you live with yourself, in such a self described role, without the power to judge but of empowering the unconscious psyche that is my own minds eye - the eye of god, my eyes to gods will tells me."
^What this entry means to me is property of everything I have ever wanted to accomplish in my life. It means I aimed at the kind of ideas that might change our world views.
As far as I am concerned this is what I do now. I scribe and I revisit what I felt at the time.
I asunder what became these ideas which cannot be expelled.
============
This entry asks what is the universe and what does that question entail. I make an attempt at this stating there are certain values we can never fully be aware.
============
This part of the thesis has two equal parts: (Part I) is describing what is my idea of participating in the universe. (Part II) That if the universe is what I say it is can it also be attributed with the same idea of what is sacred. That in both instances it is not a love of god or the combination of truth:
"you are not trapped in a universe made out of a confessional where you sit somewhere and contemplate your sins of my own emotional state of my satire in all of this."
That if there were a god what does gods will tell you. The idea is that gods will is separate from yours nor does he dictate it. Therefore, what does gods will tell you if it were a lie.
"my eyes to gods will tells me."
No comments:
Post a Comment