All information is - is our sensory experience put into action. (i.e. the action of interpretation) To live as in metanarrative are the things that put you in sensory experience. What I think is of a property value in everything I see. I assess, and in my assessment there is a sensation which I translate as I go. So, in return, I equalize this as a means to an end. This is why I am a philosopher. That in this process, my language acts as the information of sensations I experience in real time. And information travels as the source of my ideas. These ideas are words that my use of language, in its style and syntax create. So as a philosopher of experience (e.g. wisdom) I record using my poetics.
This is self mastery. And information is found in the experiencer ("the me") with relation to how I present my trained mind. Theoretically speaking, I have trained this unitarily as my sensory experience. Where the eye meets the world through its own interpretation of me. "The me" - out of my control. Which circles back to being authentic as opposite of not being predictable.
So yes - I predicate the self in relation to sensory experience as something that negates the predictable with something else that the experience creates. This is a higher state of mind, in my view. My point here is if you are not creating something new to the world, why are you doing philosophy if it's not? This infers critical thought, logical reasoning, and language (information) itself.
- Marco
No comments:
Post a Comment