In terms of self-righteous habits, the ego cannot be limited to one thing toward any thing other in particular, in particular, the irony between unconditional inhibited state in response to uninhibited nature. The external world around you would never be able to grasp the oneness in that.
If you cracked open an egg, and it was (a) filled with self-esteem, would you or would you not be happiest with your (b) brown nosing ability. I would say yes it is so.
If you failed to crack open the egg, because it was (a) not filled with self-esteem, would you (b) judge yourself in spite of it. No, that would be a habit. Which of the two coincides with an eternal reality. Neither.
The moral is what is in the egg should only matter. Cracking open an egg is the basis of what is unknowable.
So what follows both 1 - a cracked open egg and 2 - a concealed egg. . . is the constant state of repressed inability to control the world around you, in spite of what the ego is becoming of itself.
Just a quick check-up. To what I was speaking of re; analogy between comparing ego as an egg. ego = self righteous habits which fluctuate both unconditional inhibited state of being on a direct correlation with uninhibited nature as the conditional. (i.e. external reality, forces of nature, circumstantial decomposition, stimulus etc.) All this follows cause and effect, depending on the nature around you = how ego is affected internally = the nature you yourself surround effects externally. Look at the ego as a concealed egg. Then - think about what is concentrated in the egg/ego. Once the egg/ego is cracked, you find its contents to be filled with abundance, so much so you cannot help conceal your happiness. Now - if the egg/ego were concealed, would you judge yourself in spite of what might or might not be present. The shell is composed of some substance that is impenetrable to yourself or any other thing in particular. The difference in both concealed egg/ego to a cracked open egg/ego illustrate self-righteous habits. It`s representative of you breaking open the ego, before it turns inward on itself. You must think of the ego in terms of what you do not know is inside, in order for you to break it open. We often confuse the ego with a false sense of pride (outward) in place of an intimate understanding (inward), therefore we cause our own stereotype. As result, the nature of turning ego against yourself requires a skill based logic, which involves you to recognize it`s value as a whole. If the egg is unbreakable do not take what is inside for granted; nor should you judge yourself based on such a challenge that to suffer you. The main elements should now look like this: (a) what is in the ego should only matter (a concealed ego) (b)cracking open the ego is the basis of what is unknowable. (cracked open) It is natural to feel repressed inability to control the world around you, in spite of what the ego is becoming of itself, a conformity to convey truth.
4 comments:
In terms of self-righteous habits, the ego cannot be limited to one thing toward any thing other in particular, in particular, the irony between unconditional inhibited state in response to uninhibited nature. The external world around you would never be able to grasp the oneness in that.
If you cracked open an egg, and it was (a) filled with self-esteem, would you or would you not be happiest with your (b) brown nosing ability. I would say yes it is so.
If you failed to crack open the egg, because it was (a) not filled with self-esteem, would you (b) judge yourself in spite of it. No, that would be a habit. Which of the two coincides with an eternal reality. Neither.
The moral is what is in the egg should only matter. Cracking open an egg is the basis of what is unknowable.
So what follows both 1 - a cracked open egg and 2 - a concealed egg. . . is the constant state of repressed inability to control the world around you, in spite of what the ego is becoming of itself.
Just a quick check-up. To what I was speaking of re; analogy between comparing ego as an egg. ego = self righteous habits which fluctuate both unconditional inhibited state of being on a direct correlation with uninhibited nature as the conditional. (i.e. external reality, forces of nature, circumstantial decomposition, stimulus etc.) All this follows cause and effect, depending on the nature around you = how ego is affected internally = the nature you yourself surround effects externally. Look at the ego as a concealed egg. Then - think about what is concentrated in the egg/ego. Once the egg/ego is cracked, you find its contents to be filled with abundance, so much so you cannot help conceal your happiness. Now - if the egg/ego were concealed, would you judge yourself in spite of what might or might not be present. The shell is composed of some substance that is impenetrable to yourself or any other thing in particular. The difference in both concealed egg/ego to a cracked open egg/ego illustrate self-righteous habits. It`s representative of you breaking open the ego, before it turns inward on itself. You must think of the ego in terms of what you do not know is inside, in order for you to break it open. We often confuse the ego with a false sense of pride (outward) in place of an intimate understanding (inward), therefore we cause our own stereotype. As result, the nature of turning ego against yourself requires a skill based logic, which involves you to recognize it`s value as a whole. If the egg is unbreakable do not take what is inside for granted; nor should you judge yourself based on such a challenge that to suffer you. The main elements should now look like this: (a) what is in the ego should only matter (a concealed ego) (b)cracking open the ego is the basis of what is unknowable. (cracked open) It is natural to feel repressed inability to control the world around you, in spite of what the ego is becoming of itself, a conformity to convey truth.
Post a Comment