There is no point in leaving the board. Sure, great hockey minds think alike. Rise above the shadowy exceptions. I've been on the Internet since I can remember, it should be used as a vehicle, despite the candid behavior one should come to expect.
People don' agree with what I have to say all the time, I feel the need to express myself should never be compromised, so leaving the board is pointless.
People don't necessarily know how to argue, so it should make you stop and think about being alienated. Just because it's true, doesn't allow other people to stop you. It means you can decide what course of taking action, changes the outcome.
The moment people deny you that right, you have taken on the privilege of desire. There is nothing worse than a firing squad, against cries for mercy. This isn't dragon's den.
No matter how arrogant a reason never affected my choice for being objective, being belittled, or not to face it with an opinion.
Dicing onions may not make you cry, it also won't absolve your fears away, and everyone else is immune.
I have made a skill at tracing the devils whereabouts.
Moral of the story: feelings can make cowards of us all. The better question should always be understood, how does one become relevant to the conversation.
Read more:http://jetshockeyforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=business&action=display&thread=12&page=290#ixzz1xzOCbbIK
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I just figured out what truth there is that causes failure, it's the fact any one will do everything not to hold you back.
It's that if we live in a world of self-regulation that people forget about facing each other, in this day and age, of instant gratification. There is no such thing as natural delay in the mind.
"natural delay": a term used to describe what if you put your mind to something, whether or not you can achieve it, is not up to you. The idea of divine intervention does not exist. If you delay the thought of reward, then and only then, will you find success.
Therefore, "you can achieve what you put your mind to" is a myth; to make what happens in reality work toward progress. Progression comes before the work is involved. The idea is the larger picture.
If there was one perfect ending to a life you wanted to live; what might it look like. I would argue, people rather not deal with fate. So, they get use to a secular approach, resorting to superficial ends.
The medium is message as we see, how that medium is being won.
People will devalue your sense of the world, according to themselves, as you yourself can instantiate. Their sense of the world, can be completely undermining if you learn not to agree with it.
Plato's model for living the good life or not is such a deliberate joke.
"Selling out takes on an emotive level, which has never been this easy to do throughout our models of a lifetime of conscious awareness. The ancients never realized how old they were getting to be at it."
^if you do not mistake transparency over irony; you have achieved a great deal.
It's a question in how history, does not openly teach how to overcome the norms associated with it. The answer should always rely on consciousness itself.
A disappearing act: is not considered (a) artistic (b) in merit, just as in (c) history not taking on a form of it's own.
Therein lay the difference between knowing both, irony over transparency, and both, consciousness over awareness. Just as the ancients never thought before acting on consequence, causes indivisible morality.
Post a Comment