I'm willing to admit if we were ever to reach a place of connecting through this. . . it's because you're zodiac sign is cancer. My mom is the same sign. Not that it matters. What matters is how passionate a person I am, and from what I see.
----------------
There is something about you I wish I could describe. It's as though I'm talking to my own naive wish, as if my fantasy were to become reality. I suppose that is the main thesis re; all fairy tales in general. If the power of one entity were enough to change everything on the face of the earth, your life would be complete. I suppose that is the main reason for being here, we want the same things, but skeptical we are to guard ourselves - our self interests on this site. Only until someone is able to "magically" present themselves in a way that we forget who we are for a moment. We step into a fire from outside the box we were thinking in. Instead, we become aware of what the possibility might be. Could this person be the match for a fairy tale (internet fallacy).
Maybe - just maybe I am right about what I just said, but on the other hand, trying hard to find that 'equal' to you is a hard thing to be sold on.
So, I guess I have no real things of substance to add. Although I have no idea what people - females in particular - find me attractive enough based on my profile. Time will tell.
~I couldn't just make this stuff up.^
~m. ------------------
also you look like a super human being. There is something inside of me which yearns for that in people - no matter who they are. Your smile exudes joy.
one of the bigger reasons I'm on here, is to establish a sense for connecting with someone new - seeing I've had my share of time spent on here - there is no easy solution to it. You seem very easy going, and that is a great quality to have.
(You needn't reply to this email.)
peacexox
------------------
I'm beginning to think - if my imagination serves me correctly I'll have to settle for my dream woman being the Wendy's girl. How successful have you been on here?
------------------
tell me anything about your day - like something that put a smile on your face for no other reason than pure coincidence.
-------------------
RE:RE:btw Why - do you really need to do boot camp? Go to good life - that's where I go.
----------------
ur profile is very enjoyable and least expecting. Breath of fresh air, so cheers to u.
I hope you are not discouraged about me, though.
--------------------
how on earth did you make yourself a business owner by age 22? this boggles my mind.
----------------
it wasn't you at alive? Anyway, if my profile doesn't interest you, please disreagard the email. But I am confused about ur "attracted more so toward active/athletic guys" . . .I don't consider myself athletic, but definitely in pretty good shape. So I put it down as average. I mean, I'm not making a ton of money based on my physical condition, but I take care of myself. So, I hope I suffice in that dept.
-------------------
hi brit I just got home from working. I hope you had a great night. Talk to u soo~.
--------------
not see you walking through alive last night? I swear it was you, my memory of your pic (before you removed it from ur profile) I thought it must be you.
This is a harmless email, therefore, a rhetorical 'yes' or 'no' will do. Unless of course you find me utterly irresistable not to risk taking a chance, feel free to add anything else you think. That's cool by me.
But I'd like to know if I was right about alive?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
k - u have
the most devious profile pic in the gallery - it drives me absolutely bonkers.
-------------------
It's not about replying -bonita. It's about addressing the needs specific to those things you desire in a person that matters most. Everything I wrote is about you, and I feel in your response just how much you appreciate that. To me that is enough to know a person feels so intimately, connects with that part of my flesh. It's a super rare quality to find. Read what I wrote to you again - as much as you like it. I meant every word. The fact is I want you to feel free with what you have inside you.
------------------
I enjoyed speaking with you Although you have a heartwarming voice about you I hope I made the right impression on you.
-----------------------
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Fearing of potential weakness or lack of strength
Quote
There are those of us simply not intelligent enough to tell it like it is, and this follows my point that even I as an intellecutal have to strategically turn my faith inward. Why?
^Then there are people like becky, who offer no degree of strings attached, to the same end are not acting as puppets. She's a visionary of the type that seek a quiet leadership potential that can't be smelt, seen or heard, but totally equates with how equals in this world should act morally so. It's more labelled as an idealist notion of reality, when in fact it isn't at all. I blame ignorance, of the source in our world-view society dictates. If that doesn't make sense. . .
Put me on a stake, hang me, nail me to the cross, or execute me with an American firing squad. That's how true the nature of censorship decesitizes us from the truth.^
-----------------
This is all just flinstone analogies. As Pierre Trudeau would say, damn bleeding heart liberals (or conservatives for that matter) it is imperative that Trudeau is described as a type of figure that "won't suffer fools gladly." My point, hap and merk, is that we're debating a 'grand poo-ba' type of fellowship more along the likes of Knights of Columbus or some sort of free masons ontology. Social policy is a branding of the sort, but it should not be specific to discriminating forms of social justice. For people in our impoverished world, branding them is what most people (rich 'majority') of those that are not convinced. There is the problem, right? Think about it. . . if Pierre Trudeau wouldn't suffer fools gladly, would a man of his stature be able to convince the people he would need to execute a massive revolution of social welfare? Again, I say the bread winners are kept safe from even seeing the bottom of the well.
What Hap says is true - he advocates for it. That is not what I'm against. There are those of us simply not intelligent enough to tell it like it is, and this follows my point that even I as an intellecutal have to strategically turn my faith inward. Why? Because people are indiscriminate against being educated as opposed to what the situation really is (as described herein.) It's ten fold, and then again.
*hitting home my point. . .
So, merk: what time is your wife expecting me for dinner?
Yeah, I thought so.
(Not ^dissing you, just delivering the medium of this message.) This is the problem.
-----------------
^hmm. I still think swedes is better served than you or I are, don't forget hap, if I were in the same position you just described - my take on it would be they took pity on me for my efforts or to that undesirable effect. Call it psychological in nature - but I rarely care to take credit for anything - especially when it's not freely given. In your case it was just - "Hey we don't expect anything - so - you can't expect anything from us." You know what I mean - covering their assets. With swedes, they know what she's doing is fucking killer, so they shut up and are pwned by her because they know it - she's delivering them from futility.
I don't make this shit up, I just dig it - man.
---------------
shitty haircuts are the new I-wanna-be-taliban.
---------------
You hear the one about the time Marco tried adding Hap back to facebook, but hap wouldn't because I'm sorry I deleted him in the first place.
------------------
By accident. Sorry - just add me back, now.
---------------
Good points, especially about the running game. It's all about the coaching, and going to see what play-calling results in executing an effective game plan. If the Stamps predict (causing us to look inept) on offense, it'll be a "coachng mistake" of which falter in making those decisive types: in switching from plan 'a' to plan 'b' adjustments. (That is if Glenn does his 2-and-outs this week - it's becoming all too farmiliar already - Wake up!) If we fail to start making the right decisions this late in the season, it'll be a test of getting decent coaching/preperation against a stumpeder team. That is if we move slow as we did in Edmonton last time we were in Alberta and get out of their lucky to still be breathing. Tonight better I MEAN BETTER - be a lot different. I'm not kidding. If we lose tonight, I doubt we're contending for the Grey Cup if at all.
^If you just read that, the make-up and character of this team rests on the coaching now - no excuses. Our guys better be ready to execute based on the coaching tonight.
That is what I am looking for, no excuses necessary. Berry has been flattering himself all season, and I've had it up to here with the flip-flopping game in or game out. Which team shows up tonight, has to tell me something about how well they're prepared overall.
------------------
Oh man, do we close our eyes or will this defense survive our needs on offense.
Man - this game could be crazy.
There are those of us simply not intelligent enough to tell it like it is, and this follows my point that even I as an intellecutal have to strategically turn my faith inward. Why?
^Then there are people like becky, who offer no degree of strings attached, to the same end are not acting as puppets. She's a visionary of the type that seek a quiet leadership potential that can't be smelt, seen or heard, but totally equates with how equals in this world should act morally so. It's more labelled as an idealist notion of reality, when in fact it isn't at all. I blame ignorance, of the source in our world-view society dictates. If that doesn't make sense. . .
Put me on a stake, hang me, nail me to the cross, or execute me with an American firing squad. That's how true the nature of censorship decesitizes us from the truth.^
-----------------
This is all just flinstone analogies. As Pierre Trudeau would say, damn bleeding heart liberals (or conservatives for that matter) it is imperative that Trudeau is described as a type of figure that "won't suffer fools gladly." My point, hap and merk, is that we're debating a 'grand poo-ba' type of fellowship more along the likes of Knights of Columbus or some sort of free masons ontology. Social policy is a branding of the sort, but it should not be specific to discriminating forms of social justice. For people in our impoverished world, branding them is what most people (rich 'majority') of those that are not convinced. There is the problem, right? Think about it. . . if Pierre Trudeau wouldn't suffer fools gladly, would a man of his stature be able to convince the people he would need to execute a massive revolution of social welfare? Again, I say the bread winners are kept safe from even seeing the bottom of the well.
What Hap says is true - he advocates for it. That is not what I'm against. There are those of us simply not intelligent enough to tell it like it is, and this follows my point that even I as an intellecutal have to strategically turn my faith inward. Why? Because people are indiscriminate against being educated as opposed to what the situation really is (as described herein.) It's ten fold, and then again.
*hitting home my point. . .
So, merk: what time is your wife expecting me for dinner?
Yeah, I thought so.
(Not ^dissing you, just delivering the medium of this message.) This is the problem.
-----------------
^hmm. I still think swedes is better served than you or I are, don't forget hap, if I were in the same position you just described - my take on it would be they took pity on me for my efforts or to that undesirable effect. Call it psychological in nature - but I rarely care to take credit for anything - especially when it's not freely given. In your case it was just - "Hey we don't expect anything - so - you can't expect anything from us." You know what I mean - covering their assets. With swedes, they know what she's doing is fucking killer, so they shut up and are pwned by her because they know it - she's delivering them from futility.
I don't make this shit up, I just dig it - man.
---------------
shitty haircuts are the new I-wanna-be-taliban.
---------------
You hear the one about the time Marco tried adding Hap back to facebook, but hap wouldn't because I'm sorry I deleted him in the first place.
------------------
By accident. Sorry - just add me back, now.
---------------
Good points, especially about the running game. It's all about the coaching, and going to see what play-calling results in executing an effective game plan. If the Stamps predict (causing us to look inept) on offense, it'll be a "coachng mistake" of which falter in making those decisive types: in switching from plan 'a' to plan 'b' adjustments. (That is if Glenn does his 2-and-outs this week - it's becoming all too farmiliar already - Wake up!) If we fail to start making the right decisions this late in the season, it'll be a test of getting decent coaching/preperation against a stumpeder team. That is if we move slow as we did in Edmonton last time we were in Alberta and get out of their lucky to still be breathing. Tonight better I MEAN BETTER - be a lot different. I'm not kidding. If we lose tonight, I doubt we're contending for the Grey Cup if at all.
^If you just read that, the make-up and character of this team rests on the coaching now - no excuses. Our guys better be ready to execute based on the coaching tonight.
That is what I am looking for, no excuses necessary. Berry has been flattering himself all season, and I've had it up to here with the flip-flopping game in or game out. Which team shows up tonight, has to tell me something about how well they're prepared overall.
------------------
Oh man, do we close our eyes or will this defense survive our needs on offense.
Man - this game could be crazy.
politics of fear: womanizing
feeling the pain while not hurting anyone - is not seeing stupid is what stupid does apparently.
negotiation of silence in science of more-is-less drama. Say it loud - tell your sisters and tell your friends - I know who I am. ~marco
----------------
you like eating ribs?
lol yes
----------
forgive me for writing some of this non-sense. the more i come to this site, the more you've become the person i rather entertain (comapred to other people i see on here.) So i hope that acts as a small compliment, enough that it excuses my silliness. i only aim to entertain you, using my intuititive prowess.
other than that, i hope this is entertaining for you (because really that's all that this site is about) and you don't take offense to it. I certainly hope you find it amusing, without ever doubting yourself in the process. unless i cross a line i shouldn't be crossing (which i highly doubt) i get bored - so thanks for putting up with this.
lol yes it's entertaining
------------------
the best part. i told you about my voyage to pita pit (haha - voyage) when i stood there in line with a rather attractive woman. she was holding her newborn. the baby girl kept similing at me.
Awwww, i love babies. I actually drive by that Tony Roma's everyday for school
----------------
someone actually added me as a favorite. i am seriously cracking up right now.
lol, congrats
-------------
deleted me from her favorites - Lo1
man, she cut me down - but i managed to hang on for dear life. One of those "i'm too good" types I suppose - whatever. such is life.
I se too many women on here (which is to be expected) that post nice pics of their racks and completely oblivious as though they're looking for the horniest guys possible. What a waste of talent - i tell you.
anyhow - stick to your profile pic. i guess that's the moral of the story??
that's too bad, lol. But i hate the guys who take pictures of their "bulging" biceps.
HAHA, those guys are losers. Or their "six packs"
------------------
but you're the one person i actually feel genuinely happy that views my profile.
lol, then I really don't think that it takes that much to please you!
--------------
had any form of success on here yet, and if so, are you satisfied with the choices?
no, i've met a few guys, but nothing substantial. You?
------------------
what are we doing on here?
I've been studying ;;-(
---------------
wearing a scarf outdoors yet?
hell yes. it's freezing. you?
---------------------
my gosh, it is bitterly cold, wet, damp outside today. I told you about my sore throat, so I went to (hopefully 'invest') my money in a remedy at the Osborne Shoppers. There, I picked up a conjestant which I hope can interupt the cycle, or speed up the immune system's process? I don't know about over the counter cures, they can only help I suppose.
doesn't hurt to try
-------------------
Hey!
I enjoyed reading your profile. Your dog is the 3rd cutest dog I've ever seen! (I'm a little partial to my 2)
It says you're not single, not looking, so I'm wondering what you ARE looking for????
Cheers,
Rachel
Unadulterated, unhinhibited copulous amounts of time killing.
-------------
ur profile. i'm happy to see u.
ciao bello, how are you?
---------------
Things are quite well with me, I've been conjested lately - but I'm getting over the effects of a cold.
im sorry to hear your suffering....honey, lemon, and peppermint tea...works really good!
-----------------
not eat a lot of stuffing? I know I ate my little heart out. More "stuffed" my face full of gravy coated turkey. Dessert was a tiramisu, molotov, followed my my sisters dynamite mini-muffins covered in icing.
I had 2 dinners. One Sunday and one Monday, Needless to say I still feel so full. Bleh.
But it was sooooo good!
---------------
so?
no, I don't do politics. Did you vote?
---------------
this is fun. I typed in 'i 3 leftovers'. sorry.
no problem
--------------
when i'm 35 you'll be 23. I love that number.
lol, thats a good age difference
--------------
nothing too serious I hope, but I noticed your taking sciences, ut it says in your profile you have obtained a BA. Does this mean you're doing a masters program?
I also see you are up to 160 favorites-list and counting. . . congrats.
I don't have a BA, does it say that? hmmm, that's weird. Just sciences for me. I can't
believe I am on so many favourites lists considering how many people I've told off,
haha.
-----------------
I am a very easy going person, that knows how to treat a lady. Part of the reason I feel this about someone, is getting to know them first. I am not ashamed to be who I am - with the right person - who I also feel can share the same qualities. Part of the reason I am willing to take on new challenges such as this one, is to meet new, exciting, interesting types of people. I am at an age, not where I want to settle down, but have more or less the desire to experience where I really am in life. What life has to offer me, in terms of a renewed sense of responsibility to myself and others like me.
Ideally, I would like to meet a person with no strings attached.
:) nice profile you have, sounds genuine
---------------
my favorite dessert in the world with your name on it. (Afterward, comes a casserol.) You are an extremely, extremely physically attractive woman. I notice the profile you have is quite something special to behold. My question is what are you doing on here if the last time I checked being a gourgeous female should help out in the real world.
LOL, AWWWWW why thankyou, iam on here just the same as everyone, just waiting for
that right man to come along...
--------------
love your profile page. You know how to turn the right guy on!
Part of this is to make you believe, I have something to offer you in return, which is a big heart. I find myself drawn to women at this point in my life, that are not in need of a relationship, but are willing to see through a growth of one. A lot of what we are in this world, fails to acknowledge just what is truly important (and that is what I gathered from your profile about you.) My beliefs are the same as yours I would say. I think an emotional journey requires balance and coordination between two people.
~m.
thanks for the compliment on the profile im just off to the gym b4 it closes i will message you a longer message when im on next...thx again!
----------------
I just hope you are doing well. A lot of what this place has to offer is strict anonymity, and with that a lot of guessing. (Which is no wonder how beautiful you are.)
------------------------
. . . is cuter then me when you only provoke emails about your dog. (though it's not mine of course.)
----------
about super-pup
(clarify) you got the fact my last email re; hip pooch was lol's, it made perfect sense though, right? Affirmative?
--------------
babe, question. . .
(don't worry - it's not what you think.) - I kid.
But, what on earth is it with me? Do the same people constantly view you everyday? That is the way with me these days. I guess that should come as no surprise considering who are the "regulars" that might care to communicate something worth our time. I find the purpose of this site can be misleading for some.
-----------------
so have you found
lame ducks on this site. I really think that rataoulie pic of you is cute.
---------
that a gurl.
-----------
yeah. I sure did.
-------------
bahahaha. Are you serious? (laughing about the told off 'favorites') Nice, gurl. nice.
But, I am fairly certain it said BA next to the smarts in ur profile.
Another thing: my spelling is pretty bad, but I never check for errors before i fire these off to you.
---------------
I still have only 1.
I'm thinking of doing the following for halloween:
Wayne from wayne's world (doable on my list. . .)
Wolverine (a bit too ambitious I think)
Doctor (too boring.)
Pepe La Pue (U should agree with this one)
-------------
what have you done to tell a person off? I'm curious, (but not that curious if you know what I mean.)
-----------------
I am a very easy going person, that knows how to treat a lady. Part of the reason I feel this about someone, is getting to know them first. I am not ashamed to be who I am - with the right person - who I also feel can share the same qualities. Part of the reason I am willing to take on new challenges such as this one, is to meet new, exciting, interesting types of people. I am at an age, not where I want to settle down, but have more or less the desire to experience where I really am in life. What life has to offer me, in terms of a renewed sense of responsibility to myself and others like me.
Ideally, I would like to meet a person with no strings attached.
------------------
you look something like christina aguillera, only better, but I thank you for your stunning beauty.
----------------
. . .the mock trial question (just to clarify) - my bad.
When I said: "what have you done" only meant to ask when telling a person off what (specifically) do you express to do it? (Which is the only real question worth asking.)
I didn't want you to mistake I was asking something else, such as, maybe you thought I meant you were guilty in provoking such-and-such person.
--------------
are tingling - I feel you are in distress for some reason. Part of my is a worrier though, but not because I am not in touch with you, I just think you have a lot more to you than you meets the eye. (Cliche - I know.) Though in the form of my "need to know basis" I hope you are okay. I'm just thinking of you each and every day I try to connect with you.
m~
P.S. I hope you are well.
--------------
in your immediate future. In fact, you are staring at him through the lense of this computer screen, dashing across the world through tubes and back again. It makes me think about what on earth might such a sensitive female such as yourself - gain from any of this contact through the internet. (I suppose that is up for you to decide.)
When the right person comes along, don't you just know it, or can you realize it further onward without really knowing?
I suppose that is the reason you are on here without really having to retreat. The better way of doing this - is staying open to it and hopefully you will find someone as daring as you.
I have to admit, I would enjoy meeting you as you seem to be honest with how you feel.
You mention being misjudged as a person that has no impact on the world around you, I think you probably mean that others find you are unaware of their surroundings, as if they expect something from you in return for their advancements, when in truth, reality would indicate you feel failed by others as if a spite toward your better-half could dictate. As if a self defeating of sorts was caused, simply because they expect you to fill a void that is unfuliflled but not your own fault.
If I am misintrepreting this situation (not as your own) than I apologize. Nothing can forgive you for characterizing an incredibly beautiful woman - which you must be feeling right now. Just remember you are not inferior because you are treated that way - if you treat yourself the way you expect others to treat you.
I come from a great family with decent morals which I will not surpass as my own. I defend this with my honor, my blood, my courage to survive. It is more than an ego - it is part of my spirit, my soul, my envy.
Feel free with me.
Tell me more about you.
M~
--------------
re; my spidy senses
. . . are tingling - I feel you are in distress for some reason. Part of mE is a worrier though, but not because I am not in touch with you, I just think you have a lot more to you than meets the eye. (Cliche - I know.) Though in the form of my "need to know basis" I hope you are okay. I'm just thinking of you each and every day I try to connect with you.
m~
P.S. I hope you are well.
-------------
yup - that's me. I hope my spelling doesn't offend you, and seeing you are a self-employed (obviously intelligent enough to comprehend) my style of using grammer might not suit you. But I hope in the future, you find what I say to be truthful.
That pic of you on the beach is like 1000km away, but does it do you any justice??
-----------------
you are gangsta
in a nice way. You weren't kidding about being commited to the gym b4 it closes. I find that oddly attractive but don't ask me why. I enjoy goodlife now that it opened, since I started going there on rt90. I'm not going to lie about you being a knock out, but gansta's are my specialty.
-------------
no sweat
I just hope you are doing well. A lot of what this place has to offer is strict anonymity, and with that a lot of guessing. (Which is no wonder how beautiful you are.)
negotiation of silence in science of more-is-less drama. Say it loud - tell your sisters and tell your friends - I know who I am. ~marco
----------------
you like eating ribs?
lol yes
----------
forgive me for writing some of this non-sense. the more i come to this site, the more you've become the person i rather entertain (comapred to other people i see on here.) So i hope that acts as a small compliment, enough that it excuses my silliness. i only aim to entertain you, using my intuititive prowess.
other than that, i hope this is entertaining for you (because really that's all that this site is about) and you don't take offense to it. I certainly hope you find it amusing, without ever doubting yourself in the process. unless i cross a line i shouldn't be crossing (which i highly doubt) i get bored - so thanks for putting up with this.
lol yes it's entertaining
------------------
the best part. i told you about my voyage to pita pit (haha - voyage) when i stood there in line with a rather attractive woman. she was holding her newborn. the baby girl kept similing at me.
Awwww, i love babies. I actually drive by that Tony Roma's everyday for school
----------------
someone actually added me as a favorite. i am seriously cracking up right now.
lol, congrats
-------------
deleted me from her favorites - Lo1
man, she cut me down - but i managed to hang on for dear life. One of those "i'm too good" types I suppose - whatever. such is life.
I se too many women on here (which is to be expected) that post nice pics of their racks and completely oblivious as though they're looking for the horniest guys possible. What a waste of talent - i tell you.
anyhow - stick to your profile pic. i guess that's the moral of the story??
that's too bad, lol. But i hate the guys who take pictures of their "bulging" biceps.
HAHA, those guys are losers. Or their "six packs"
------------------
but you're the one person i actually feel genuinely happy that views my profile.
lol, then I really don't think that it takes that much to please you!
--------------
had any form of success on here yet, and if so, are you satisfied with the choices?
no, i've met a few guys, but nothing substantial. You?
------------------
what are we doing on here?
I've been studying ;;-(
---------------
wearing a scarf outdoors yet?
hell yes. it's freezing. you?
---------------------
my gosh, it is bitterly cold, wet, damp outside today. I told you about my sore throat, so I went to (hopefully 'invest') my money in a remedy at the Osborne Shoppers. There, I picked up a conjestant which I hope can interupt the cycle, or speed up the immune system's process? I don't know about over the counter cures, they can only help I suppose.
doesn't hurt to try
-------------------
Hey!
I enjoyed reading your profile. Your dog is the 3rd cutest dog I've ever seen! (I'm a little partial to my 2)
It says you're not single, not looking, so I'm wondering what you ARE looking for????
Cheers,
Rachel
Unadulterated, unhinhibited copulous amounts of time killing.
-------------
ur profile. i'm happy to see u.
ciao bello, how are you?
---------------
Things are quite well with me, I've been conjested lately - but I'm getting over the effects of a cold.
im sorry to hear your suffering....honey, lemon, and peppermint tea...works really good!
-----------------
not eat a lot of stuffing? I know I ate my little heart out. More "stuffed" my face full of gravy coated turkey. Dessert was a tiramisu, molotov, followed my my sisters dynamite mini-muffins covered in icing.
I had 2 dinners. One Sunday and one Monday, Needless to say I still feel so full. Bleh.
But it was sooooo good!
---------------
so?
no, I don't do politics. Did you vote?
---------------
this is fun. I typed in 'i 3 leftovers'. sorry.
no problem
--------------
when i'm 35 you'll be 23. I love that number.
lol, thats a good age difference
--------------
nothing too serious I hope, but I noticed your taking sciences, ut it says in your profile you have obtained a BA. Does this mean you're doing a masters program?
I also see you are up to 160 favorites-list and counting. . . congrats.
I don't have a BA, does it say that? hmmm, that's weird. Just sciences for me. I can't
believe I am on so many favourites lists considering how many people I've told off,
haha.
-----------------
I am a very easy going person, that knows how to treat a lady. Part of the reason I feel this about someone, is getting to know them first. I am not ashamed to be who I am - with the right person - who I also feel can share the same qualities. Part of the reason I am willing to take on new challenges such as this one, is to meet new, exciting, interesting types of people. I am at an age, not where I want to settle down, but have more or less the desire to experience where I really am in life. What life has to offer me, in terms of a renewed sense of responsibility to myself and others like me.
Ideally, I would like to meet a person with no strings attached.
:) nice profile you have, sounds genuine
---------------
my favorite dessert in the world with your name on it. (Afterward, comes a casserol.) You are an extremely, extremely physically attractive woman. I notice the profile you have is quite something special to behold. My question is what are you doing on here if the last time I checked being a gourgeous female should help out in the real world.
LOL, AWWWWW why thankyou, iam on here just the same as everyone, just waiting for
that right man to come along...
--------------
love your profile page. You know how to turn the right guy on!
Part of this is to make you believe, I have something to offer you in return, which is a big heart. I find myself drawn to women at this point in my life, that are not in need of a relationship, but are willing to see through a growth of one. A lot of what we are in this world, fails to acknowledge just what is truly important (and that is what I gathered from your profile about you.) My beliefs are the same as yours I would say. I think an emotional journey requires balance and coordination between two people.
~m.
thanks for the compliment on the profile im just off to the gym b4 it closes i will message you a longer message when im on next...thx again!
----------------
I just hope you are doing well. A lot of what this place has to offer is strict anonymity, and with that a lot of guessing. (Which is no wonder how beautiful you are.)
------------------------
. . . is cuter then me when you only provoke emails about your dog. (though it's not mine of course.)
----------
about super-pup
(clarify) you got the fact my last email re; hip pooch was lol's, it made perfect sense though, right? Affirmative?
--------------
babe, question. . .
(don't worry - it's not what you think.) - I kid.
But, what on earth is it with me? Do the same people constantly view you everyday? That is the way with me these days. I guess that should come as no surprise considering who are the "regulars" that might care to communicate something worth our time. I find the purpose of this site can be misleading for some.
-----------------
so have you found
lame ducks on this site. I really think that rataoulie pic of you is cute.
---------
that a gurl.
-----------
yeah. I sure did.
-------------
bahahaha. Are you serious? (laughing about the told off 'favorites') Nice, gurl. nice.
But, I am fairly certain it said BA next to the smarts in ur profile.
Another thing: my spelling is pretty bad, but I never check for errors before i fire these off to you.
---------------
I still have only 1.
I'm thinking of doing the following for halloween:
Wayne from wayne's world (doable on my list. . .)
Wolverine (a bit too ambitious I think)
Doctor (too boring.)
Pepe La Pue (U should agree with this one)
-------------
what have you done to tell a person off? I'm curious, (but not that curious if you know what I mean.)
-----------------
I am a very easy going person, that knows how to treat a lady. Part of the reason I feel this about someone, is getting to know them first. I am not ashamed to be who I am - with the right person - who I also feel can share the same qualities. Part of the reason I am willing to take on new challenges such as this one, is to meet new, exciting, interesting types of people. I am at an age, not where I want to settle down, but have more or less the desire to experience where I really am in life. What life has to offer me, in terms of a renewed sense of responsibility to myself and others like me.
Ideally, I would like to meet a person with no strings attached.
------------------
you look something like christina aguillera, only better, but I thank you for your stunning beauty.
----------------
. . .the mock trial question (just to clarify) - my bad.
When I said: "what have you done" only meant to ask when telling a person off what (specifically) do you express to do it? (Which is the only real question worth asking.)
I didn't want you to mistake I was asking something else, such as, maybe you thought I meant you were guilty in provoking such-and-such person.
--------------
are tingling - I feel you are in distress for some reason. Part of my is a worrier though, but not because I am not in touch with you, I just think you have a lot more to you than you meets the eye. (Cliche - I know.) Though in the form of my "need to know basis" I hope you are okay. I'm just thinking of you each and every day I try to connect with you.
m~
P.S. I hope you are well.
--------------
in your immediate future. In fact, you are staring at him through the lense of this computer screen, dashing across the world through tubes and back again. It makes me think about what on earth might such a sensitive female such as yourself - gain from any of this contact through the internet. (I suppose that is up for you to decide.)
When the right person comes along, don't you just know it, or can you realize it further onward without really knowing?
I suppose that is the reason you are on here without really having to retreat. The better way of doing this - is staying open to it and hopefully you will find someone as daring as you.
I have to admit, I would enjoy meeting you as you seem to be honest with how you feel.
You mention being misjudged as a person that has no impact on the world around you, I think you probably mean that others find you are unaware of their surroundings, as if they expect something from you in return for their advancements, when in truth, reality would indicate you feel failed by others as if a spite toward your better-half could dictate. As if a self defeating of sorts was caused, simply because they expect you to fill a void that is unfuliflled but not your own fault.
If I am misintrepreting this situation (not as your own) than I apologize. Nothing can forgive you for characterizing an incredibly beautiful woman - which you must be feeling right now. Just remember you are not inferior because you are treated that way - if you treat yourself the way you expect others to treat you.
I come from a great family with decent morals which I will not surpass as my own. I defend this with my honor, my blood, my courage to survive. It is more than an ego - it is part of my spirit, my soul, my envy.
Feel free with me.
Tell me more about you.
M~
--------------
re; my spidy senses
. . . are tingling - I feel you are in distress for some reason. Part of mE is a worrier though, but not because I am not in touch with you, I just think you have a lot more to you than meets the eye. (Cliche - I know.) Though in the form of my "need to know basis" I hope you are okay. I'm just thinking of you each and every day I try to connect with you.
m~
P.S. I hope you are well.
-------------
yup - that's me. I hope my spelling doesn't offend you, and seeing you are a self-employed (obviously intelligent enough to comprehend) my style of using grammer might not suit you. But I hope in the future, you find what I say to be truthful.
That pic of you on the beach is like 1000km away, but does it do you any justice??
-----------------
you are gangsta
in a nice way. You weren't kidding about being commited to the gym b4 it closes. I find that oddly attractive but don't ask me why. I enjoy goodlife now that it opened, since I started going there on rt90. I'm not going to lie about you being a knock out, but gansta's are my specialty.
-------------
no sweat
I just hope you are doing well. A lot of what this place has to offer is strict anonymity, and with that a lot of guessing. (Which is no wonder how beautiful you are.)
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Thanksgiving feast
Quote from: Hap on Today at 05:02 AM
What decent presidents?
^Read what I said above.
The allure of Obama-magic is playing out on people's imagined unicorn with wings - while obama has done. Listen carefully to this mans clever politcal rhetoric, (which I can say probably falls on deaf ears of real objectivity - but I digress. . . ) he says virtually nothing substanital and does not take impartial views on any subject matter. McCain has easily won the last two debates rather impressively I might add, with far more honest, straight-forward approach. That is only my opinion.
--------------
Quote from: Hap on Today at 03:29 AM
Yes, but it's a minority with a demoralized bankrupt opposition. So it might as well be a majority.
I would have to agree with that, hap. However, take my opinion (for what it's worth) which any political science course will tell you. The "opposition" are merely playing lapdog politics to the mock-majority government, which in this case, being a minority government is what keeps the windmill turning. The conservatives are satisfied playing a desperate self-brand of ideas which in the case of Canadians does not establish as a sound nor promisiing electorate. This only tells me - as it should tell you as well. . . that the conservative based ideology does not in fact represent Cnd interests as its aim. It's focus is entirely 'Harper-nomics' which is devious at best. With Harper at the helm, they will never secure a majority government. At any rate, I am happy with that. It speaks for mediocre principles, and a mock-conservative assembly which is content with it's dubious leadership history. They've banked on this as a model, and now have to live with playing it out of harms way. That is not the fault of any civil-abiding servant, the government in it's entirety can see just how flaky the conservatives are - and - are merely seeking office for the petting zoo.
P.S. Obama is a self centered poltiician. Do not kid yourselves, the reason he is in the race is because of corporate donations which were against Hillary Clinton's campaign from the start. They didn't want to see Clinton form a powerful form of leadership, so, Obama is a puppet. You guys are completely blind - and I am glad to tell you that you are. Stop kidding yourselves about Obama. Read this, but stop your bleeding hearts - please.
---------------
We're not preaching to the choir here (at least I would hope not) but a minoirty government is just what the doctor ordered.
--------------
And for the record re; unicef - because I care about your vote. . .
When someone such as myself tells you what you need to hear, make no mistake about it - I pull no punches. I cut straight through the bs.
I think you are not a moderate, that should inspire you to believe in yourself as a voter, my belief is you are a sneaky "moderate". I think, you know exactly who you should vote for as to what is best for the francophones in this country. I have always stood less than impartial to the better foreign demographic, far more than just a surcharge of tax-reform solutions. A vote to better our communities is a vote for freedom, not so if you jive with the bigwigs.
So there you are. ~
--------------
For the better interest of the few. That is how you vote.
i. If you aggrevate the sexy-choice as leader, Harper wins on aggregate. I voted Pat Martin. A guy who I would emulate.
ii. If you vote conservative, i do feel for you. . . in this case a french demographic is second class to this countries native reserves, to place Harper-nomics above that you are selling out your vote to American interests. Ask Robert Bourassa who he would choose as leader?
iii. If you vote for a Liberal who is close to partisanship against a rival Conservative member, you should vote liberal.
-----------------
~let the derby begin (and end) with a few surprises in store that everybody agrees with.
-----------------
re; anthem hockey song
Why they don't use Stompin Toms song would represent Canada just fine if you ask me. HNIC now has a tune that you feel like marching along with.
---------------
I am giving vegas the benefit of the doubt, clearly most leaf fans have no idea what that means. It's not a good idea to characterize the teams fate this early on especially in the wake of a new head coach. They have faith in Fletcher, that's great, but it's a long shot to make the playoffs right now I'd think. I am a firm believer that nothing matters until about game 60 of the regular season.
As for the Canucks, they have about a good a shot at the Cup as the Oilers do. . . which is pretty minimal.
----------------
well - that one guy won the anthem challenge with a song that doesn't remind me of hockey whatsoever. If that's not positive, I don't know what else is.
------------
Fuck, that killed me last night. that poor chick - man.
---------------
I am glad to be a true romantic.
--------------
I have to say, layton is the clear front-runner for playboy magazine in this election campaign. Just watching him doing his speech today was rather ominous of what the other candidates are doing.
Harper is acting like a pimp - fresh off a short-order cooks line.
Stephen Dion is limping off into the night like a hunchback.
Duceppe clearly defines his role: why everybody hates the french.
Elizabeth May is a whoring communist prodigy.
Hap, tell me is this election like you stated in 88' that Mulroney needed only 40% of the popular vote to form the majority?
-------------------
dry humping is a tell tale sign of repressed sexual desires.
--------------
That's a good idea. Keep kissing him on the forhead, it releases chemicals in the babies brain that help reinforce its development.
---------------
The nhl really over-dramatized the start of this year. . . but whatever.
I swear - i could not be the one person who thought how it hurt to watch that nhl.network chick who was doing the correspondence. I felt bad for her.
------------------
The 13y.o. version sounds more about a walt disney cartoon then what it's originally replacing. If you ask me, if people are voting for the kid it's simply based on pure 'how cute' he looks.
=----------------
*btw - McCain is mopping the floor with obama right now.
-------------
sound advice.
=-===
just fuck.
====
Is that pic a 9/11 suicide jumper?
-----------
If you did something about how honest my feelings are, maybe I would.
--------------
Oh - sure. Let's attribute a democracy in this case - American ideology of democracy - that if there's a war going on and we vote for the same president in support of that war makes you patriotic. Not only that, since we vote "patriotically" means we fully adopt it as a "democratic war" because after all, a democratic vote represents due dilligence.
Obama is of course the answer. pfft.
--------------
Quote
patting a chick's bum on the campaign trail and then botched the debate.
this can only mean one of two things, being. . . turner let his sense of power/fame get to his head, or this was a victory for ultra-conservative feminists everywhere at the time. I'll say, I hope her ass was worth it.
------------------
^f'ing solid post, marco.
----------------
I am fairly certain that the NDP has never since had such a prominent number of seats in the house.
It's funny how things turn out, which is to say, we know not of redemption in politcal welfare in this country. The beast is fragile at best among its voters. We're very disconnected with the bigger picture based on futile forms of government bodies, which our agencies as liberals or conservatives or democrats are run. I'm speaking of our autonomy as freedom loving people only obsessed with our disconsorted view of reality. We are happy with apathy especially when it comes to civil servants. This is my honest opinion, because which of the political party prevails, our ineptitude is how those leaders manipulate the masses knowing full well they'll be getting away with murder (in political terminology.) What else did Brian Mulroney do but disipate the minority (in this case a large contingent of anti-liberal. . . more specifically anti-trudeau conspirators) provoking disparity among the inner circles of cnd. refomists. At that time, when Trudeau was at full throttle, Lucien Bouchard bitch slapped Mulroney, stole his credibility, and created a divided Quebec on the sovereignty issue. This analysis of such, suggests the anti-liberal movement certainly had a lot of weight behind Mulroney's rise to political fame, not that Mulroney was any good to trust as a leader.
The cycle of anti-liberal campaigning goes, is a conservative staple, as is evidence of a mediocre Stockwell Day, Preston Manning, or Ralph Klein. In behind the polls slips voter confidence, resorting to Jack Layton's opposition as leader of the NDP.
So, our contingency as a fragile wasteland of voters can only blame ourselves as we have a liberal, conservative, liberal, conservative love affair.
Next thing your going to tell me, is that American's didn't vote for Bush in the last election because they didn't want a war in Iraq to continue, or how about "We're voting for Obama, because we're tired of a war we voted in favor of." Obama simply takes a back seat in the voters eyes, and those that want will vote as hypocrites for Obama. I certainly do not trust Obama based on that specifically.
-----------------
I forget the main reason voters swayed away from voting Turner. If I remembered correctly it had something to do with Turner gaffing upon, what some have said, cost Turner. It was a question that Mulroney directed at Turner from which point Turner's reply was 'I don't know (.?.?.? what I would do in such and such circumstances)'. I just always seem to forget what that critical anamoly was for the hammer being thrown down on Turner - to that effect.
---------------
fuck i just wanted to punch mulroney square in the face. watching that makes me ashamed to know the avg cnd elected him.
---------------------
In 1988 - I swear to you i felt john turner was going to be our pm. That is all. thank you.
p.s. man was turner on fire.
------------------
sadie's history between her and I has been what it is. she's gone on record saying she thinks i'm nuts, which kept her from even developing an honest relationship no matter what it meant. I'd get pissed, because i have no idea what i needed to do to convince her. that's the deal.
-----------------
okay, this amirite thing is getting old now. why does it even matter anymore.
---------------
Quote from: Sadie on October 03, 2008, 09:18AM
it means we're lucky to get a year off in this country...some don't have the privilege.
I already knew that, I was making a sarcastic remark about what milking the system means for some people unlike others who (as you say) act according to having a privilege.
Good for people for taking some time off. It's nothing to envy.
-------------------
All that I've heard in this process of poltical jargon has been the word 'deregulation' as if it means something unsubstantiated by a bunch of re-re's being excused for their own ends. Surprise, surprise. What else is new, hap.
--------------
It's hard to believe we're part of a thread, where x meets y over a message board to produce its offspring.
it boggles my f'n mind.
-----------------
well there's a (insert zing here) if I ever saw one.
---------------
I am not going down this road again, but, it's the environment. It's not like it's rocket science. Not goonie's fault whatsoever.
------------------
I still fail to see how any of your banter, recognizes that irresponsible people do not justify irresponsible government. The classic argument is how government separates itself to buy voters confidence in politics. In the case of economics, for people that are blind to "big government" are those that are in power want to take advantage of. So, that way not only does the bureaucracy - depend on - rather it emphasizes - how banks govern the kind of mortgages awarded. It's a slippery slope the whole way through. Nobody takes blame, hear no evil see no evil. In the end, it's the people that are being gouged, which keeps the government relevant so to necessitate the form of control. The need is all an illusion of supremacy.
All the banks claim to do is give us what we want, and that's what governments love to feed off of.
What you guys are disputing against isn't as Merk states counter to socialism, nor is it about corruption as hap suggests. Capital is politics without intervention, to completely disqualify extortion as the main principle which drives political welfare within that framework is erroneous at best.
---------------------
i just cannot fathom the bills start this year. i hate the cowboys as well.
---------------
are u referring to the steelers performance or just the nfl season thus far in general. Be specific please, don't say 'both'.
---------------
Honestly, it's great to feel something about a guy you don't know whatsoever be so truthfully admired.
------------
Quote from: languedoc on September 27, 2008, 01:04PM
The Sens have stunk up the league since '93.
The Canucks since fifteen years before that until present.
Toni Tanti-LOL
if i were a player today, i'd be the best 3rd liner in the game. that being said, i'd play on a line with chris neil simply to spite the leafs.
-----------------------
i'm just glad we're back to the 80's. it's quite refreshing and long overdue. I blame gary batman - yes batman - for the shit hockey which resulted in playing trap style hockey.
So yeah, the habs are a force to be reckoned with means all is back to normal.
------------------
You see everybody, all you need to do is take note. Ask the right question and you win.
-----------------
Tams
Re: Tamar
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2008, 10:46PM »
oh please, marco. for all the great drafting they've done they've still done shit all and choked every single year. yeah, they made it to the finals... what did they do when they got there? choked. last year? choked. years before? choked.
eventually you have to do something with all the great kids you're drafting. the sens'll shit the bed as usual.
toonces Re: Tamar
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2008, 11:02PM »
Yeah, hard to disagree with that.
--------------------
that is utter bs and you know it. the republicans are using the bail out scheme as incentive for potential swing voters (McCain). I mean give me a break, how people cannot see this is beyond comprehension. This says nothing for obama either, but spare the illusion of a miracle worker. just bs politics right now. pfft.
--------------
I'm not so much a fan of the sens if your theory proves me correct. I am however a fan of Gerber, alfredsson, eugene melnyk (for fostering a team in a cnd city that acts as more philanthropy than anything else.) How the leafs operate is far more or less objective, seeing that ottawa has great depth when considering how well they draft players (movement within that organization.) I am a fan of the sens for reasons which the leafs have failed miserably to do. It doesn't mean that if the leafs finally had a change of the guard, not so if they're always trying to build on past success models followed by predecessing leaf teams. That's the way it goes i'm afraid.
------------------
Tamar,
the nhl is reverting back to the old-school style of scoring we used to see back in the 80's. Teams like the canucks are going to feel it (before Bure arrived in van.) and it's going to hurt. Not that you guys don't have a high pain threshold, but don't hold your breath. You guys are going to have the same kind of team when toni tanti was your captain. That goes for the leafs (pre-sundin era also). It's going to be a long ride.
P.S. go sens.
----------------
your gm is f'n brutal.
--------------
i look forward to watching vancouver completely turn upside down after this season. it's going to be great scraping the cellar.
-----------------
To answer the question fairly zoo', think about it another way. . . the Bombers were stood up for a go ahead td on the one, which should have put us in the clear. Good teams find ways to win these games, I must say.
----------
Serna booting a 42 yard fg. A pleasant surprise in a close game.
-------
Yeah, the fact Keith is back in the cfl is awesome.
------------------
I must say Edwards deserves accolades.
Right now, all that matters is we've established an offense that can score.
------------------
i don't know if anyone else hasn't figured it out yet. Simon does that pose mimicking his son, who makes that pose child-like. It has nothing to do with vintage superman.
--------------------
Okay, I like those responses. But for sake of argument the seed that was planted let's call it: (post Nov07 gc loss). I would say paints a pretty large measuring point for this team. You know how it goes: what really measures a team? I argue, through changes (Armstead, Serna, Moreno, Smith, Reid) are the crucial elements. These guys are helping a fairly egotistical-arrogant-childish brand of football, completely overcome (again for the sake of argument) Nov07.
Think about it.
It's not because of Bauer, or Taman, or Berry. These players are so critical to the success of a team that can easily be 2-10 (1=win/Glenn 1=win/Widdie) instead of 4-8 = much more promising.
Without these guys stated above, I'd say, a team with Glenn returning to form due to a running game resulted in calling his own plays much more effectively. Terrance Edwards was almost non-existent for the first 8 games of the season, and Armstrong dropping catchable balls. Now it's entirely the opposite.
Also, part of this all boils down to the main argument which becomes how negligent the entire team's philosophy (Doug Berry - especially Doug Berry included) lost sight of over-coming that gc loss in 07. When Sask. came in here and we lost to Bishop - of all qb's - that our defense shut down in Toronto's 07' east.final?? I couldn't believe how far we had to go, that this team couldn't lay a beat down on Sask. for stealing what was ours. I was dumbfounded by the players lack of effort/desire was embarassing.
Then Roberts is traded.
Sask. beats us at home, with Glenn's lousy 4th qrt leadership. 2-out's was what sealed our fate that Sunday @ Canada Inns.
Now here we are, with a team that has begun to believe in playing football again, but it has to be for the right reason. That reason I suggest, is because the players forgot to feel what losing that gc in 07' was about.
If my theory proves correct, this team can go into Mtl come Nov., and clean up at Molson Stadium.
------------------
Quite frankly, i think you are wrong in your assesment of the main argument. Sure b/t/berry could have spared this train wreck from occuring far before the changes were made. Therefore, you are wrong about where you've assumed "bringing in those players" should be attributed to managment. It was mngt that dropped the ball since this season began. The truth lies in the players (I forgot to mention kai ellis) that have picked up where we should have left off after Nov07 gc loss. (I think that should make more sense now.) The concluded part of that argument: is for those players such as (Armstrong, Edwards) who were so crucial in getting us to nov07gc should have been a wake up call into this year. It wasn't. Instead, the leaders from last years team totally packed up the tent. . . if that doesn't make sense to you. . . considering now new leaders have emerged, the nov07gc was clearly the stumbling block. It's the new blood that leads the charge now, as last years team have to pick up their slack. It's a clear indication that last years blow is now forgotton, because of the right players, not necessarily our inept mangament material on maroons road.
Tell me, are there any other team members the bombers have that could actually make this argument from 07-08? It's the players attitudes. It's a huge intangible to have when getting to the scrappiest part of the season.
----------------
Another player I forgot to mention was Samuels. Samuels could very well be the feel good story for this team's season thus far.
I am a huge believer in the make-up of a post-gc loss does to a teams inner psyche. It runs a deep current psychologically. So much so, in fact, I would break the bank on it simply based on the experience.bigcanadiano
------------------
The cfl may as well use Glenn as an example for how the refs are completely clued out. If there's no suspension for it, the league faces an embarassing precedent.
----------------
5-8 heading into edm is not so bad. Those licks samuels smacked down were just viscious. kudos to jason. great grab by armstrong.
People are saying this game was an indication of glenn's ability to overcome (a late hit) but playing with a concussion. There is no need for dangerous hits, and glenn should never have been exposed to that (thanks cfl.) But make no mistake, a toronto team that has last years most outstanding player/gc with sask. can keep those labels.
5-8.
-----------------
alrighty then.
basically, joseph under kent austin was spoon fed his limited ability at reading defenses is now accentuated in toronto. Given the fact Sask. also gives joseph credence to counter the fact Glenn would've won the gc last year anyhow. (Which also gives my opinion on how a gc loss means more than "we played good enough to win -but still lost.")
kthanx,
a better bomber fan.
----------------
yeah.
- loved how big country stated we were going to win next week on the score post-game locker room interview. that was beyond gold.
-------------------
jm02 wrote:
There is no need to lock this thread. Carry on...
note to thread: not locked.
we'll hit a player just to spite you instead.
--------------------
There are three things that I know in life, which should I promise provide the reader with some form of intangible insight will also prove I am worthy of credibility under.
1 - That the Green Bay Packers should had never and I mean never not re-signed Brett Farve.
2 - I wish I could have a car as cool as the Knight Rider, but I can live with the tv show for now.
3 - Wayne Gretky's daughter. (I should hope) - were available to me.
^These are things that some people would agree with - others maybe not. However, that doesn't stop me from seeing what reality we are faced with. My point is, I am at least making the proposition for change as a possibility. It goes a for a heck of a lot in my books.
-----------------
(How man. . .) -what don't you understand?
Putting myself in place of dignity re; my intent of this thread let's ask: if you were in Kevin Glenn's shoes. I am simply making a statement (which others belly aching about a non-suspension fail to deliver.)
If I were part of a union, I simply wouldn't care what unions say and do. That meaning I stand up for myself no matter what the cost. Clearly Glenn cannot do that. So instead, we have a bunch of prima donna's with which escape into their foxholes. (So much of canadian bravery or lack thereof. . .)
So if you are following what you just read: I pull no punches. Make no mistake. I am not all talk, because I've done it before.
So, this is more about sticking up for Kevin with some reverse psychology. "I hate Kevin Glenn" = cfl 'as if' they were saying that.
^That follows, my punchline. . . of watching Glenn pull the grenade against the same rivals (That Higgins was once a member of.)
I don't play the blame game. I stand the truth. With me or against me. A lot of people I know hate me because of it.
But I love it.
------------------
the cfl is laughable. just laughable.
----------------
i honestly don't know what to say, and that rarely happens.
---------------
Excellent post by footballmad. I couldn't put it better myself.
---------------
by footballmad on 03 Oct, 2008 - 16:29
I am super pumped for this game to.
I am pretty pissed that Cohon now issued the new mandatory suspension for head after he whimps out a suspension on barrenchea. I agree with suspension for shots like that but if the league is going to enforce this rule barrenchea should have been the first one to take the hit for it. what a coward move to let him off the hook.
-----------------
We said EXACTLY the same thing verbatim to last weeks game. . . and look at what happened.
--------------
Att; Gavin Walls, Kai Ellis, Standford Samuels. . .
permission to seek and destroy granted.
---------------
the stupidest thing is our special teams lost us this game in the second qrt.
that fake punt was ridiculous/
------------------
i don't buy it. these guys were not ready to pay the price? They simply stopped playing football after prefontaine tossed such an incredibly stupid fake punt, and the bomber's felt shame.
f'n pathetic display of heart. i mean being outcoached is one thing: which we totally were.
-----------------
Are you of the same opinion (with regard to Ray's time back there tonight) that our d-line didn't even get a sniff rushing the qb well until the 4th qrt.
I mean: this was inexcusible. where the f' did the guys go instead of showing up for work tonight.
Oh i know, 1st qrt.
-----------------
the way we played tonight, i couldn't care less.
----------
re; pigseye
ouch. (tips hat)
-----------
by PIGSEYE on 04 Oct, 2008 - 22:31
The guy is an absolute momentum killer, that field goal would have given them a glimmer of hope and he snuffed it out. There can't be a single player on the team who has any confidence in the kid, which has to make you wonder how much confidence they can have in a coach who sticks with him.
----------------
by bigcanadiano on 05 Oct, 2008 - 02:28
PIGSEYE wrote:
bigcanadiano wrote:
i don't buy it. these guys were not ready to pay the price? They simply stopped playing football after prefontaine tossed such an incredibly stupid fake punt, and the bomber's felt shame.
f'n pathetic display of heart. i mean being outcoached is one thing: which we totally were.
Out-coached in all 3 phases too boot, by supposedly one of the worst staffs in the league. Believe me, as soon as the Eskimo players smelt blood, they were like a starving dog on a t-bone. While our guys just got bent over and took it. Call it heart or whatever you like, but you have to pay the price in the trenches and our guys didn't.
But I'm not arguing with you there. i actually think we're agreeing.
But a total collapse in each of the three most important facets, defense, offense, special teams. . . did someone walk out with a white flag???
---------------
bigcanadiano on 05 Oct, 2008 - 02:29
Chief wrote:
I actually thought your D-Line played well. Better than our O-Line, anyway. You guys kept collapsing the pocket and pushing it into Ray. Even later in the game, we were able to hold you guys back, but you were still able to break up the pocket.
man, you have a totally different read on the game I saw. we just blew.
----------------------
honestly,
i never thought you could out-coach someone. (But, d. berry has proved me wrong.)
Once again. . . to our fragile o-line that got pushed around in their panties all night long, great work there.
I am quickly assuming berry will have yet another bleeding heart after this one. A game this important, totally washed out due to nothing but the coaching. . . and to none other than d.macho to boot. I mean seriously. I can't believe it. The bleeding heart berry has to end, i won't stand for it anymore.
absoultely humiliating performance simply based on the effort involved.
---------------
Release Serna immediately
uh - yeah.
kthnx
thmngnt
P.S. Oh - wait, we don't have managment.
P.S.S - congrats serna.
------------
Which is why you won't catch me posting on ourbombers.
I am beyond fuming about last nights turkey-bowl.
Just fuming.
I am more pointing the blame toward Berry's bleeding heart cover-up plan he seems to resort.
--------------
the fake punt is an achilles heel. I haven't brought it up (in my posts) because I'm still in denial over it. Those are embarassing to have happen, and hurt to watch.
The focus is this:
If it's so easy, why don't I be the coach? - Yes - yes I would.
In the most pivotal point in the game, we're up by a score of 14-2, the esk. offense is just non-existent. . . I am going to call 'fire' on my special teams. plain and simple. Then what happens??
they pull a b-slap move on us, and from that moment onward, the defense says f'u to the special teams unit (psychological factor) the offense follows-up with nothing and the wheels fall off. The entire game was a self-destructive display based on sheer ignorance.
What a team, eh.
Can' the lot of them I say. Who cares already.
------------
Yeah, adding insult to injury (when we lose) is totally not about the coaching. pfft.
-------------
re; sanjay, bluecrew, housedog
. . .i'm just thowing my weight behind some of your comments. they're always welcome here.
to do what we did in the play-off's last year, the odds are most definitely against us, and the bomber's are holding onto that. I don't want a repeat from last year, it only proves that it was mediocre at best.
-------------
the running game won us this game. hurrah.
P.S. can someone tell me what rod black's initial description of a terrance edwards 'hockey' celebration post-td? I missed that part.
--------------
1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by papazoola on 12 Oct, 2008 - 11:27
....reading the CFL home-page....i just read the take they had on the Fog Bowl.... which took 2 days to play ...because the fog was as thick as pea soup...The author of the article had a definite slant from a Ti-Cat perspective...i remember it a little different....I believe the Bombers were down 14 zip in that one before we started to play....Ploen finally got us going...and Leo Lewis ( the cats' still have night-mares about Leo, lol .) ran for a couple of tds. and threw for one on an option play....He was Mr. Bomber as far as i was concerned ...No. 29 could do it all....We sure didn't care for the Cats of those years....Stuff like how they were going to 'waffle' us....Their coach had some gems...Bud Grant just went about his business and we kicked their 'can'...Great days for the BigBlue...pardon me for getting a little nostalgic...
---------------------
Re: 1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by bigcanadiano on 12 Oct, 2008 - 11:38
nice post.
-------------
Re: 1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by papazoola on 12 Oct, 2008 - 13:45
....thanks bigcanadiano....It sure would be nice to have our present-day team reach the status we had in the 'day'...i think we need a little work.....Re-reading that home-page post on the fog bowl....i get the feeling from the article, the cats are still wondering what happened to them, in that one.....It's simple really ....their very-good team. got beat by a better one.... Go-BigBlue
-------------
Doug Brown to the power of
by bigcanadiano on 12 Oct, 2008 - 17:48
Jarome Haywood.
Listening to the postgame show, bob and mitch were advocating for Brown as this years m.o.p. in Bomber colors. I would have to agree with that. Watching Brown do his swim moves, ripping through the oppostions backfield, all but walking on fire with his bare feet. . . really is fun to watch happening. Through Brown's experience, it's hard not to double team the guy, but with Jarome Haywood, Brown has been a force on the D-line this season.
If the Bombers even get to Montreal in the post-season, 2001 might be avenged with Brown having been part of it. He's come this far.
----------------
I. The wildcat formation
by bigcanadiano on 13 Oct, 2008 - 16:35
I want to see the Bombers do this on offense.
This question is inspired due to the recent success of nfl teams adopting this choice of play-calling.
I'm wondering if this link is correct?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR76aoKghM8
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2008/10/12/dolphins-wildcat-formation-brings-another-wrinkle-another-big/
I'm trying to guess what the degree of difficulty is on offense to execute these plays, based on defensive coverage.
-----------------
the hockey celebration
someone simply has neglected to youtube that masterpiece of a post-td party. I mean that was beyond gold-ish. My purpose for this thread is that someone is inspired to do it, because if I knew how to I would've.
---------
Since we're talking about hockey (the td skit was remarkable -btw)
TSN: CBC called - they're begging for thier old anthem back. lo!
What decent presidents?
^Read what I said above.
The allure of Obama-magic is playing out on people's imagined unicorn with wings - while obama has done. Listen carefully to this mans clever politcal rhetoric, (which I can say probably falls on deaf ears of real objectivity - but I digress. . . ) he says virtually nothing substanital and does not take impartial views on any subject matter. McCain has easily won the last two debates rather impressively I might add, with far more honest, straight-forward approach. That is only my opinion.
--------------
Quote from: Hap on Today at 03:29 AM
Yes, but it's a minority with a demoralized bankrupt opposition. So it might as well be a majority.
I would have to agree with that, hap. However, take my opinion (for what it's worth) which any political science course will tell you. The "opposition" are merely playing lapdog politics to the mock-majority government, which in this case, being a minority government is what keeps the windmill turning. The conservatives are satisfied playing a desperate self-brand of ideas which in the case of Canadians does not establish as a sound nor promisiing electorate. This only tells me - as it should tell you as well. . . that the conservative based ideology does not in fact represent Cnd interests as its aim. It's focus is entirely 'Harper-nomics' which is devious at best. With Harper at the helm, they will never secure a majority government. At any rate, I am happy with that. It speaks for mediocre principles, and a mock-conservative assembly which is content with it's dubious leadership history. They've banked on this as a model, and now have to live with playing it out of harms way. That is not the fault of any civil-abiding servant, the government in it's entirety can see just how flaky the conservatives are - and - are merely seeking office for the petting zoo.
P.S. Obama is a self centered poltiician. Do not kid yourselves, the reason he is in the race is because of corporate donations which were against Hillary Clinton's campaign from the start. They didn't want to see Clinton form a powerful form of leadership, so, Obama is a puppet. You guys are completely blind - and I am glad to tell you that you are. Stop kidding yourselves about Obama. Read this, but stop your bleeding hearts - please.
---------------
We're not preaching to the choir here (at least I would hope not) but a minoirty government is just what the doctor ordered.
--------------
And for the record re; unicef - because I care about your vote. . .
When someone such as myself tells you what you need to hear, make no mistake about it - I pull no punches. I cut straight through the bs.
I think you are not a moderate, that should inspire you to believe in yourself as a voter, my belief is you are a sneaky "moderate". I think, you know exactly who you should vote for as to what is best for the francophones in this country. I have always stood less than impartial to the better foreign demographic, far more than just a surcharge of tax-reform solutions. A vote to better our communities is a vote for freedom, not so if you jive with the bigwigs.
So there you are. ~
--------------
For the better interest of the few. That is how you vote.
i. If you aggrevate the sexy-choice as leader, Harper wins on aggregate. I voted Pat Martin. A guy who I would emulate.
ii. If you vote conservative, i do feel for you. . . in this case a french demographic is second class to this countries native reserves, to place Harper-nomics above that you are selling out your vote to American interests. Ask Robert Bourassa who he would choose as leader?
iii. If you vote for a Liberal who is close to partisanship against a rival Conservative member, you should vote liberal.
-----------------
~let the derby begin (and end) with a few surprises in store that everybody agrees with.
-----------------
re; anthem hockey song
Why they don't use Stompin Toms song would represent Canada just fine if you ask me. HNIC now has a tune that you feel like marching along with.
---------------
I am giving vegas the benefit of the doubt, clearly most leaf fans have no idea what that means. It's not a good idea to characterize the teams fate this early on especially in the wake of a new head coach. They have faith in Fletcher, that's great, but it's a long shot to make the playoffs right now I'd think. I am a firm believer that nothing matters until about game 60 of the regular season.
As for the Canucks, they have about a good a shot at the Cup as the Oilers do. . . which is pretty minimal.
----------------
well - that one guy won the anthem challenge with a song that doesn't remind me of hockey whatsoever. If that's not positive, I don't know what else is.
------------
Fuck, that killed me last night. that poor chick - man.
---------------
I am glad to be a true romantic.
--------------
I have to say, layton is the clear front-runner for playboy magazine in this election campaign. Just watching him doing his speech today was rather ominous of what the other candidates are doing.
Harper is acting like a pimp - fresh off a short-order cooks line.
Stephen Dion is limping off into the night like a hunchback.
Duceppe clearly defines his role: why everybody hates the french.
Elizabeth May is a whoring communist prodigy.
Hap, tell me is this election like you stated in 88' that Mulroney needed only 40% of the popular vote to form the majority?
-------------------
dry humping is a tell tale sign of repressed sexual desires.
--------------
That's a good idea. Keep kissing him on the forhead, it releases chemicals in the babies brain that help reinforce its development.
---------------
The nhl really over-dramatized the start of this year. . . but whatever.
I swear - i could not be the one person who thought how it hurt to watch that nhl.network chick who was doing the correspondence. I felt bad for her.
------------------
The 13y.o. version sounds more about a walt disney cartoon then what it's originally replacing. If you ask me, if people are voting for the kid it's simply based on pure 'how cute' he looks.
=----------------
*btw - McCain is mopping the floor with obama right now.
-------------
sound advice.
=-===
just fuck.
====
Is that pic a 9/11 suicide jumper?
-----------
If you did something about how honest my feelings are, maybe I would.
--------------
Oh - sure. Let's attribute a democracy in this case - American ideology of democracy - that if there's a war going on and we vote for the same president in support of that war makes you patriotic. Not only that, since we vote "patriotically" means we fully adopt it as a "democratic war" because after all, a democratic vote represents due dilligence.
Obama is of course the answer. pfft.
--------------
Quote
patting a chick's bum on the campaign trail and then botched the debate.
this can only mean one of two things, being. . . turner let his sense of power/fame get to his head, or this was a victory for ultra-conservative feminists everywhere at the time. I'll say, I hope her ass was worth it.
------------------
^f'ing solid post, marco.
----------------
I am fairly certain that the NDP has never since had such a prominent number of seats in the house.
It's funny how things turn out, which is to say, we know not of redemption in politcal welfare in this country. The beast is fragile at best among its voters. We're very disconnected with the bigger picture based on futile forms of government bodies, which our agencies as liberals or conservatives or democrats are run. I'm speaking of our autonomy as freedom loving people only obsessed with our disconsorted view of reality. We are happy with apathy especially when it comes to civil servants. This is my honest opinion, because which of the political party prevails, our ineptitude is how those leaders manipulate the masses knowing full well they'll be getting away with murder (in political terminology.) What else did Brian Mulroney do but disipate the minority (in this case a large contingent of anti-liberal. . . more specifically anti-trudeau conspirators) provoking disparity among the inner circles of cnd. refomists. At that time, when Trudeau was at full throttle, Lucien Bouchard bitch slapped Mulroney, stole his credibility, and created a divided Quebec on the sovereignty issue. This analysis of such, suggests the anti-liberal movement certainly had a lot of weight behind Mulroney's rise to political fame, not that Mulroney was any good to trust as a leader.
The cycle of anti-liberal campaigning goes, is a conservative staple, as is evidence of a mediocre Stockwell Day, Preston Manning, or Ralph Klein. In behind the polls slips voter confidence, resorting to Jack Layton's opposition as leader of the NDP.
So, our contingency as a fragile wasteland of voters can only blame ourselves as we have a liberal, conservative, liberal, conservative love affair.
Next thing your going to tell me, is that American's didn't vote for Bush in the last election because they didn't want a war in Iraq to continue, or how about "We're voting for Obama, because we're tired of a war we voted in favor of." Obama simply takes a back seat in the voters eyes, and those that want will vote as hypocrites for Obama. I certainly do not trust Obama based on that specifically.
-----------------
I forget the main reason voters swayed away from voting Turner. If I remembered correctly it had something to do with Turner gaffing upon, what some have said, cost Turner. It was a question that Mulroney directed at Turner from which point Turner's reply was 'I don't know (.?.?.? what I would do in such and such circumstances)'. I just always seem to forget what that critical anamoly was for the hammer being thrown down on Turner - to that effect.
---------------
fuck i just wanted to punch mulroney square in the face. watching that makes me ashamed to know the avg cnd elected him.
---------------------
In 1988 - I swear to you i felt john turner was going to be our pm. That is all. thank you.
p.s. man was turner on fire.
------------------
sadie's history between her and I has been what it is. she's gone on record saying she thinks i'm nuts, which kept her from even developing an honest relationship no matter what it meant. I'd get pissed, because i have no idea what i needed to do to convince her. that's the deal.
-----------------
okay, this amirite thing is getting old now. why does it even matter anymore.
---------------
Quote from: Sadie on October 03, 2008, 09:18AM
it means we're lucky to get a year off in this country...some don't have the privilege.
I already knew that, I was making a sarcastic remark about what milking the system means for some people unlike others who (as you say) act according to having a privilege.
Good for people for taking some time off. It's nothing to envy.
-------------------
All that I've heard in this process of poltical jargon has been the word 'deregulation' as if it means something unsubstantiated by a bunch of re-re's being excused for their own ends. Surprise, surprise. What else is new, hap.
--------------
It's hard to believe we're part of a thread, where x meets y over a message board to produce its offspring.
it boggles my f'n mind.
-----------------
well there's a (insert zing here) if I ever saw one.
---------------
I am not going down this road again, but, it's the environment. It's not like it's rocket science. Not goonie's fault whatsoever.
------------------
I still fail to see how any of your banter, recognizes that irresponsible people do not justify irresponsible government. The classic argument is how government separates itself to buy voters confidence in politics. In the case of economics, for people that are blind to "big government" are those that are in power want to take advantage of. So, that way not only does the bureaucracy - depend on - rather it emphasizes - how banks govern the kind of mortgages awarded. It's a slippery slope the whole way through. Nobody takes blame, hear no evil see no evil. In the end, it's the people that are being gouged, which keeps the government relevant so to necessitate the form of control. The need is all an illusion of supremacy.
All the banks claim to do is give us what we want, and that's what governments love to feed off of.
What you guys are disputing against isn't as Merk states counter to socialism, nor is it about corruption as hap suggests. Capital is politics without intervention, to completely disqualify extortion as the main principle which drives political welfare within that framework is erroneous at best.
---------------------
i just cannot fathom the bills start this year. i hate the cowboys as well.
---------------
are u referring to the steelers performance or just the nfl season thus far in general. Be specific please, don't say 'both'.
---------------
Honestly, it's great to feel something about a guy you don't know whatsoever be so truthfully admired.
------------
Quote from: languedoc on September 27, 2008, 01:04PM
The Sens have stunk up the league since '93.
The Canucks since fifteen years before that until present.
Toni Tanti-LOL
if i were a player today, i'd be the best 3rd liner in the game. that being said, i'd play on a line with chris neil simply to spite the leafs.
-----------------------
i'm just glad we're back to the 80's. it's quite refreshing and long overdue. I blame gary batman - yes batman - for the shit hockey which resulted in playing trap style hockey.
So yeah, the habs are a force to be reckoned with means all is back to normal.
------------------
You see everybody, all you need to do is take note. Ask the right question and you win.
-----------------
Tams
Re: Tamar
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2008, 10:46PM »
oh please, marco. for all the great drafting they've done they've still done shit all and choked every single year. yeah, they made it to the finals... what did they do when they got there? choked. last year? choked. years before? choked.
eventually you have to do something with all the great kids you're drafting. the sens'll shit the bed as usual.
toonces Re: Tamar
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2008, 11:02PM »
Yeah, hard to disagree with that.
--------------------
that is utter bs and you know it. the republicans are using the bail out scheme as incentive for potential swing voters (McCain). I mean give me a break, how people cannot see this is beyond comprehension. This says nothing for obama either, but spare the illusion of a miracle worker. just bs politics right now. pfft.
--------------
I'm not so much a fan of the sens if your theory proves me correct. I am however a fan of Gerber, alfredsson, eugene melnyk (for fostering a team in a cnd city that acts as more philanthropy than anything else.) How the leafs operate is far more or less objective, seeing that ottawa has great depth when considering how well they draft players (movement within that organization.) I am a fan of the sens for reasons which the leafs have failed miserably to do. It doesn't mean that if the leafs finally had a change of the guard, not so if they're always trying to build on past success models followed by predecessing leaf teams. That's the way it goes i'm afraid.
------------------
Tamar,
the nhl is reverting back to the old-school style of scoring we used to see back in the 80's. Teams like the canucks are going to feel it (before Bure arrived in van.) and it's going to hurt. Not that you guys don't have a high pain threshold, but don't hold your breath. You guys are going to have the same kind of team when toni tanti was your captain. That goes for the leafs (pre-sundin era also). It's going to be a long ride.
P.S. go sens.
----------------
your gm is f'n brutal.
--------------
i look forward to watching vancouver completely turn upside down after this season. it's going to be great scraping the cellar.
-----------------
To answer the question fairly zoo', think about it another way. . . the Bombers were stood up for a go ahead td on the one, which should have put us in the clear. Good teams find ways to win these games, I must say.
----------
Serna booting a 42 yard fg. A pleasant surprise in a close game.
-------
Yeah, the fact Keith is back in the cfl is awesome.
------------------
I must say Edwards deserves accolades.
Right now, all that matters is we've established an offense that can score.
------------------
i don't know if anyone else hasn't figured it out yet. Simon does that pose mimicking his son, who makes that pose child-like. It has nothing to do with vintage superman.
--------------------
Okay, I like those responses. But for sake of argument the seed that was planted let's call it: (post Nov07 gc loss). I would say paints a pretty large measuring point for this team. You know how it goes: what really measures a team? I argue, through changes (Armstead, Serna, Moreno, Smith, Reid) are the crucial elements. These guys are helping a fairly egotistical-arrogant-childish brand of football, completely overcome (again for the sake of argument) Nov07.
Think about it.
It's not because of Bauer, or Taman, or Berry. These players are so critical to the success of a team that can easily be 2-10 (1=win/Glenn 1=win/Widdie) instead of 4-8 = much more promising.
Without these guys stated above, I'd say, a team with Glenn returning to form due to a running game resulted in calling his own plays much more effectively. Terrance Edwards was almost non-existent for the first 8 games of the season, and Armstrong dropping catchable balls. Now it's entirely the opposite.
Also, part of this all boils down to the main argument which becomes how negligent the entire team's philosophy (Doug Berry - especially Doug Berry included) lost sight of over-coming that gc loss in 07. When Sask. came in here and we lost to Bishop - of all qb's - that our defense shut down in Toronto's 07' east.final?? I couldn't believe how far we had to go, that this team couldn't lay a beat down on Sask. for stealing what was ours. I was dumbfounded by the players lack of effort/desire was embarassing.
Then Roberts is traded.
Sask. beats us at home, with Glenn's lousy 4th qrt leadership. 2-out's was what sealed our fate that Sunday @ Canada Inns.
Now here we are, with a team that has begun to believe in playing football again, but it has to be for the right reason. That reason I suggest, is because the players forgot to feel what losing that gc in 07' was about.
If my theory proves correct, this team can go into Mtl come Nov., and clean up at Molson Stadium.
------------------
Quite frankly, i think you are wrong in your assesment of the main argument. Sure b/t/berry could have spared this train wreck from occuring far before the changes were made. Therefore, you are wrong about where you've assumed "bringing in those players" should be attributed to managment. It was mngt that dropped the ball since this season began. The truth lies in the players (I forgot to mention kai ellis) that have picked up where we should have left off after Nov07 gc loss. (I think that should make more sense now.) The concluded part of that argument: is for those players such as (Armstrong, Edwards) who were so crucial in getting us to nov07gc should have been a wake up call into this year. It wasn't. Instead, the leaders from last years team totally packed up the tent. . . if that doesn't make sense to you. . . considering now new leaders have emerged, the nov07gc was clearly the stumbling block. It's the new blood that leads the charge now, as last years team have to pick up their slack. It's a clear indication that last years blow is now forgotton, because of the right players, not necessarily our inept mangament material on maroons road.
Tell me, are there any other team members the bombers have that could actually make this argument from 07-08? It's the players attitudes. It's a huge intangible to have when getting to the scrappiest part of the season.
----------------
Another player I forgot to mention was Samuels. Samuels could very well be the feel good story for this team's season thus far.
I am a huge believer in the make-up of a post-gc loss does to a teams inner psyche. It runs a deep current psychologically. So much so, in fact, I would break the bank on it simply based on the experience.bigcanadiano
------------------
The cfl may as well use Glenn as an example for how the refs are completely clued out. If there's no suspension for it, the league faces an embarassing precedent.
----------------
5-8 heading into edm is not so bad. Those licks samuels smacked down were just viscious. kudos to jason. great grab by armstrong.
People are saying this game was an indication of glenn's ability to overcome (a late hit) but playing with a concussion. There is no need for dangerous hits, and glenn should never have been exposed to that (thanks cfl.) But make no mistake, a toronto team that has last years most outstanding player/gc with sask. can keep those labels.
5-8.
-----------------
alrighty then.
basically, joseph under kent austin was spoon fed his limited ability at reading defenses is now accentuated in toronto. Given the fact Sask. also gives joseph credence to counter the fact Glenn would've won the gc last year anyhow. (Which also gives my opinion on how a gc loss means more than "we played good enough to win -but still lost.")
kthanx,
a better bomber fan.
----------------
yeah.
- loved how big country stated we were going to win next week on the score post-game locker room interview. that was beyond gold.
-------------------
jm02 wrote:
There is no need to lock this thread. Carry on...
note to thread: not locked.
we'll hit a player just to spite you instead.
--------------------
There are three things that I know in life, which should I promise provide the reader with some form of intangible insight will also prove I am worthy of credibility under.
1 - That the Green Bay Packers should had never and I mean never not re-signed Brett Farve.
2 - I wish I could have a car as cool as the Knight Rider, but I can live with the tv show for now.
3 - Wayne Gretky's daughter. (I should hope) - were available to me.
^These are things that some people would agree with - others maybe not. However, that doesn't stop me from seeing what reality we are faced with. My point is, I am at least making the proposition for change as a possibility. It goes a for a heck of a lot in my books.
-----------------
(How man. . .) -what don't you understand?
Putting myself in place of dignity re; my intent of this thread let's ask: if you were in Kevin Glenn's shoes. I am simply making a statement (which others belly aching about a non-suspension fail to deliver.)
If I were part of a union, I simply wouldn't care what unions say and do. That meaning I stand up for myself no matter what the cost. Clearly Glenn cannot do that. So instead, we have a bunch of prima donna's with which escape into their foxholes. (So much of canadian bravery or lack thereof. . .)
So if you are following what you just read: I pull no punches. Make no mistake. I am not all talk, because I've done it before.
So, this is more about sticking up for Kevin with some reverse psychology. "I hate Kevin Glenn" = cfl 'as if' they were saying that.
^That follows, my punchline. . . of watching Glenn pull the grenade against the same rivals (That Higgins was once a member of.)
I don't play the blame game. I stand the truth. With me or against me. A lot of people I know hate me because of it.
But I love it.
------------------
the cfl is laughable. just laughable.
----------------
i honestly don't know what to say, and that rarely happens.
---------------
Excellent post by footballmad. I couldn't put it better myself.
---------------
by footballmad on 03 Oct, 2008 - 16:29
I am super pumped for this game to.
I am pretty pissed that Cohon now issued the new mandatory suspension for head after he whimps out a suspension on barrenchea. I agree with suspension for shots like that but if the league is going to enforce this rule barrenchea should have been the first one to take the hit for it. what a coward move to let him off the hook.
-----------------
We said EXACTLY the same thing verbatim to last weeks game. . . and look at what happened.
--------------
Att; Gavin Walls, Kai Ellis, Standford Samuels. . .
permission to seek and destroy granted.
---------------
the stupidest thing is our special teams lost us this game in the second qrt.
that fake punt was ridiculous/
------------------
i don't buy it. these guys were not ready to pay the price? They simply stopped playing football after prefontaine tossed such an incredibly stupid fake punt, and the bomber's felt shame.
f'n pathetic display of heart. i mean being outcoached is one thing: which we totally were.
-----------------
Are you of the same opinion (with regard to Ray's time back there tonight) that our d-line didn't even get a sniff rushing the qb well until the 4th qrt.
I mean: this was inexcusible. where the f' did the guys go instead of showing up for work tonight.
Oh i know, 1st qrt.
-----------------
the way we played tonight, i couldn't care less.
----------
re; pigseye
ouch. (tips hat)
-----------
by PIGSEYE on 04 Oct, 2008 - 22:31
The guy is an absolute momentum killer, that field goal would have given them a glimmer of hope and he snuffed it out. There can't be a single player on the team who has any confidence in the kid, which has to make you wonder how much confidence they can have in a coach who sticks with him.
----------------
by bigcanadiano on 05 Oct, 2008 - 02:28
PIGSEYE wrote:
bigcanadiano wrote:
i don't buy it. these guys were not ready to pay the price? They simply stopped playing football after prefontaine tossed such an incredibly stupid fake punt, and the bomber's felt shame.
f'n pathetic display of heart. i mean being outcoached is one thing: which we totally were.
Out-coached in all 3 phases too boot, by supposedly one of the worst staffs in the league. Believe me, as soon as the Eskimo players smelt blood, they were like a starving dog on a t-bone. While our guys just got bent over and took it. Call it heart or whatever you like, but you have to pay the price in the trenches and our guys didn't.
But I'm not arguing with you there. i actually think we're agreeing.
But a total collapse in each of the three most important facets, defense, offense, special teams. . . did someone walk out with a white flag???
---------------
bigcanadiano on 05 Oct, 2008 - 02:29
Chief wrote:
I actually thought your D-Line played well. Better than our O-Line, anyway. You guys kept collapsing the pocket and pushing it into Ray. Even later in the game, we were able to hold you guys back, but you were still able to break up the pocket.
man, you have a totally different read on the game I saw. we just blew.
----------------------
honestly,
i never thought you could out-coach someone. (But, d. berry has proved me wrong.)
Once again. . . to our fragile o-line that got pushed around in their panties all night long, great work there.
I am quickly assuming berry will have yet another bleeding heart after this one. A game this important, totally washed out due to nothing but the coaching. . . and to none other than d.macho to boot. I mean seriously. I can't believe it. The bleeding heart berry has to end, i won't stand for it anymore.
absoultely humiliating performance simply based on the effort involved.
---------------
Release Serna immediately
uh - yeah.
kthnx
thmngnt
P.S. Oh - wait, we don't have managment.
P.S.S - congrats serna.
------------
Which is why you won't catch me posting on ourbombers.
I am beyond fuming about last nights turkey-bowl.
Just fuming.
I am more pointing the blame toward Berry's bleeding heart cover-up plan he seems to resort.
--------------
the fake punt is an achilles heel. I haven't brought it up (in my posts) because I'm still in denial over it. Those are embarassing to have happen, and hurt to watch.
The focus is this:
If it's so easy, why don't I be the coach? - Yes - yes I would.
In the most pivotal point in the game, we're up by a score of 14-2, the esk. offense is just non-existent. . . I am going to call 'fire' on my special teams. plain and simple. Then what happens??
they pull a b-slap move on us, and from that moment onward, the defense says f'u to the special teams unit (psychological factor) the offense follows-up with nothing and the wheels fall off. The entire game was a self-destructive display based on sheer ignorance.
What a team, eh.
Can' the lot of them I say. Who cares already.
------------
Yeah, adding insult to injury (when we lose) is totally not about the coaching. pfft.
-------------
re; sanjay, bluecrew, housedog
. . .i'm just thowing my weight behind some of your comments. they're always welcome here.
to do what we did in the play-off's last year, the odds are most definitely against us, and the bomber's are holding onto that. I don't want a repeat from last year, it only proves that it was mediocre at best.
-------------
the running game won us this game. hurrah.
P.S. can someone tell me what rod black's initial description of a terrance edwards 'hockey' celebration post-td? I missed that part.
--------------
1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by papazoola on 12 Oct, 2008 - 11:27
....reading the CFL home-page....i just read the take they had on the Fog Bowl.... which took 2 days to play ...because the fog was as thick as pea soup...The author of the article had a definite slant from a Ti-Cat perspective...i remember it a little different....I believe the Bombers were down 14 zip in that one before we started to play....Ploen finally got us going...and Leo Lewis ( the cats' still have night-mares about Leo, lol .) ran for a couple of tds. and threw for one on an option play....He was Mr. Bomber as far as i was concerned ...No. 29 could do it all....We sure didn't care for the Cats of those years....Stuff like how they were going to 'waffle' us....Their coach had some gems...Bud Grant just went about his business and we kicked their 'can'...Great days for the BigBlue...pardon me for getting a little nostalgic...
---------------------
Re: 1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by bigcanadiano on 12 Oct, 2008 - 11:38
nice post.
-------------
Re: 1962 CUP...WHAT A GAME
by papazoola on 12 Oct, 2008 - 13:45
....thanks bigcanadiano....It sure would be nice to have our present-day team reach the status we had in the 'day'...i think we need a little work.....Re-reading that home-page post on the fog bowl....i get the feeling from the article, the cats are still wondering what happened to them, in that one.....It's simple really ....their very-good team. got beat by a better one.... Go-BigBlue
-------------
Doug Brown to the power of
by bigcanadiano on 12 Oct, 2008 - 17:48
Jarome Haywood.
Listening to the postgame show, bob and mitch were advocating for Brown as this years m.o.p. in Bomber colors. I would have to agree with that. Watching Brown do his swim moves, ripping through the oppostions backfield, all but walking on fire with his bare feet. . . really is fun to watch happening. Through Brown's experience, it's hard not to double team the guy, but with Jarome Haywood, Brown has been a force on the D-line this season.
If the Bombers even get to Montreal in the post-season, 2001 might be avenged with Brown having been part of it. He's come this far.
----------------
I. The wildcat formation
by bigcanadiano on 13 Oct, 2008 - 16:35
I want to see the Bombers do this on offense.
This question is inspired due to the recent success of nfl teams adopting this choice of play-calling.
I'm wondering if this link is correct?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR76aoKghM8
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2008/10/12/dolphins-wildcat-formation-brings-another-wrinkle-another-big/
I'm trying to guess what the degree of difficulty is on offense to execute these plays, based on defensive coverage.
-----------------
the hockey celebration
someone simply has neglected to youtube that masterpiece of a post-td party. I mean that was beyond gold-ish. My purpose for this thread is that someone is inspired to do it, because if I knew how to I would've.
---------
Since we're talking about hockey (the td skit was remarkable -btw)
TSN: CBC called - they're begging for thier old anthem back. lo!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)