The following is based on an article found on the Internet of pluralist ignorance re; rape.
http://www.whitehorsestar.com/archive/story/song-promoting-rape-culture-shouldnt-be-aired-listener/
I refuse to solicit anything as rape culture that promotes against my better judgment. Anything to do with rape deserves to be fought (of which is obvious in its discourse and function). Especially if the culprit thinks they can willfully ...victimize others. If you want to talk about rape culture, move it to the prison industrial complex and see what you find. The double standard between 1- what you think and 2- what you do not know is 3- the furthest thing from the truth. Rape is not a definition of being defenseless against its attacker, it is about your awareness of romance, which is a far more sophisticated force.
What we lack culture. . . is the penalty of culture itself. Think about that.
Now you will hear the voices of despair wondering why I endorse rape. (Now ask if I question those motives were I were made aware of them.) For example: did you rape her = is a loaded question.
What classifies as rape is a very subjective non-sequitur. It suggests ignorance on two levels: one that is oblivious to sexual favors (therefore unwarranted), and the other which is consensually based (therefore permissible).
I am perfectly happy being a single man without which I refuse to settle for less than my expectation. Does that make me a racist or a coward which are the very basis of rape. It is a valid approach to the opposition of a basic human instinct.
I refuse to solicit anything as rape culture that promotes against my better judgment.
=======
1- What we lack culture. . . is the penalty of culture itself. Think about that.
2- Now you will hear the voices of despair wondering why I endorse rape. (Now ask if I question those motives were I made aware of them.) For example:
did you rape her = is a loaded question.
3- What classifies as rape is a very subjective non-sequitur. It suggests ignorance on two levels: one that is oblivious to sexual favors (therefore unwarranted), and the other which is consensually based (therefore permissible).
=======
Legend:
1- What we lack in culture is based on how insipid we are on a unilateral level. Therefore, the less culture in society, the more there is an incriminating engendered population. Religion gives rise to what acts as an example re; its unbelievers of how reformed that culture is NOT on the basis of gender equality, but assigning gender roles. This proves as agents of society, we adopt conventions of liability between genders. On the one hand you have a male dominated population that women use their sexuality as a weapon, on the other hand you have men whose perverse relation of surrender is to their subordinate masochist dogma. (i.e. power hungry)
2- Cultural norms involve theory in place of irony: consider the following. . . to illicit response from me would also be true because I have been forsaken into committing an act, in this case rape. (Note: Only if I were to admit my motives were intentionally based on forcing a person to have sex with me.) Where is the logic in that. "Yes, I meant to rape her." That is very suggestive of pluralist ignorance, insofar as everyone knows rape is wrong.
3- No two things can be alike (quantifiably), quite simply, that rape is classified under law as a vile act of volition against its victim or in the case of sexual violence can be appropriated in terms of a utilitarian perspective. This helps explain one of two things: both persons regardless of each gender stereotype (as are dependent on sexual preference: straight, gay, bisexual) only one half can be oblivious to sexual favor, the other half is consensual as law permits. The danger in rape forges a relationship BETWEEN those ideals. One does not know the difference of what signals are being transmitted as sexual innuendo, the other acts as if the consent has been provided, which is the apex of sexuality. It is does not help explain what determines behavior as acceptable.
No comments:
Post a Comment