https://www.instagram.com/reel/DODzUHgj0wD/?igsh=OWViYnV5M3Zqa2Vu
September 5th, 2025 °●°○°○°○°○
To be fair, seeing something as theoretically invalid also meaning that one's superiority (in this case Nietzsche’s) to that model (again, in this case Nietzsche) does qualify that which you are disclaiming is non-contradictory. What I have stated is Nietzsche acting philosophically aims at negation of religion. Therefore, to debunk anything Nietzsche (using his quantitative methods) within reason has to prove that theocracy in principle is false, which can only be seen as contradictory. If you were to reject this line of thinking, then - you can prove that all men burn crosses reading his paranoia driven ideologies. Which is empirically misguided in thought. Nietzsche may have invented anti theological views, but we can test them through his vernacular as socially unacceptable. °●°○°○°○○°○° - Marco Almeida ©️ 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment