If I could, I would simplify physics - its fundamental most basic parts, calling upon qualitatively what can only empirically be validated. = Theoretical physics needs to be reduced to component levels.
1- That it distinguishes in deciphering what is measurement of itself.
2- Recognizing patterns that we can associate on a literal level.
Metaphysics can improve upon itself a rational sense of scientific inquiry to the philosopher stone. The personal reality (i.e identity) in ones use of imagination, if one feels completely at peace had proof of what is ~ solid ~ epistemological observation.
Ones dedication to scientific observation, can only be contested using impartial methods to penetrate theoretical physics as a model. (e.g. what are the building blocks if physics were metaphysically based) The models that physics have applied do not substantively gather as qualitative nor are empirically valid in its invariable science-based rationale. Most of theoretical physics cannot be proven under strict modular definitions that actually can be understood on a basic level of inquiry. Otherwise, the system collapses. Therefore, most theoretical treatments falter.
Metaphysical intuitionism is something that inferior models can only presume - if science accurately connotes observation and THE RESULT is in fact empirically and posteriorily sound.
"Too much" of theoretical physics has observatory models swinging from branches and are expressed as if qualitatively sound. (But metaphysically fail.) Because philosophic ends in presenting empirically science-based measurement is the key to valid reasoning. Logic as humanities only tool to unlock or guide one's void.
No comments:
Post a Comment