When it comes to a diversity, relatively speaking we readily adhere to such rules that have not yet been set in place. In this disassembled form of hierarchy, an emergence in what we see in reality, as opposed to what is permissible (i.e. real time) takes place. What is this reality in light of a mirror being held.
How do we carry the same idea, imprinted in our mind as is the reflection of choices being made at random.
Perhaps what gives rise to truth prevailing, just so happens the same truth, cannot find a measure.
It's not so obvious, but you know in your heart you have to stick to your guns because the world is set against you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
This was not so easy to realize at first, but now that I have uncovered my thoughts into such a value of expression, I can see the cast of shadowy figures brought into language, are not set in place where my nature belongs to.
What is the story of ambition, if failure is a success.
That is a question of severity.
In so much of today's day in age in our history, what takes the course of ambition is mistaken identity. We all assimilate to the same leverage of immunity, which in place of social societal norms, we function based on the model of industry. In other words we rely heavily on socioeconomic language to regulate the playing field.
Now that I've taken to the notion of a socioeconomic reality, this lends well to the fact, of a fire hidden beneath the surface of ourselves. I was asked this week, why is it so hard to find something you love to do. To which I replied, such a question is only a myth. When it comes to the model of industry which drives all socioeconomic norms in a social welfare state, I provided the same question, with asking which is more beneficial to society today. The fact that we are blind to our senses, or that we are awake, which one is worse. I say we are brutalized the same way, if we are blind we may as well not be awake to see it.
Now back to my original question; what if there is success in failure. Success is failure in the sense that we are only limited. To be driven by the means of success, such as in industry, becomes a norm. The concept of competition dilutes our unfamiliar version of leading a life worth living, to a procurement of industrialized models.
For sake of intervention, we regress to those norms associated with models of industry, only to think we are being given the opportunity to compete with ourselves.
In fact, the nature of industry has eclipsed our moral landscape into not thinking truthfully to ourselves as to what vision might we aim at, if we were not faulted for making abysmal choices. These are choices if they are seen that make us inferior to models of industry.
So if we lent ourselves to a procurement of identity rather than mixing it with being champions of industry, we would find the fire in ourselves to truly do something that feels not as peculiar. We ourselves would in fact find a much larger desire to be fulfilled with something we passion at will.
Therefore, I envision myself as a separate entity in and of myself. To cancel the means of industry.
On the condition of what is thought of as human history opposed to the industrialized model of our present day. In what way this carries our understanding of a previous nature to ourselves, compares to an elimination of industry from the conscious awareness or desirable will. Nothing about industry is desirable in a world made up of consumerism.
So this reverts back to the human condition relative to models of industry, which only return, our unconscious fire within ourselves. Industry is not a embodiment of our natural right as individuals, which the desire we truly wish to act. The skill of having a connect to your soul, is to displace the rational contingency that industry analytically holds over our most naked desires.
Post a Comment