Calculating risk in the absent age of reason

Failure: this is congruent to the belief I encounter if seeing one's true faith were blind in gods eyes.

Failure is something that is not testing the will or facing fear. It is a virtue. The meaning behind failure, is a difference that exists, most people that deny failure in their everyday lives hold impartial against it.

In order to see a clear and vibrant way of living, to lead one's life is to feel that failing in anything is a opportunity to grow. Yet, in a world dominated by fear of failing, so much of it depends not upon rate of success, but, rather it depends on the willing to fail. Mistakes are not independent of failure. When you slice into a fraction - part of the fraction is failure, with other half - the will to succeed - in what you believe will make you better, what fraction could possibly make you decide which is the denominator to cause you from failing? Can you prevent failure? Should you increase that imaginary power to prevent it? What if you took the part of the fraction you were sure was the 'success' piece of the fraction, that it'd ensure you unending success without failing? You probably would take the piece of the fraction that denominates failure from success.

The main point being that even if such a fraction did in fact exist, you could not possibly get to it without accepting failure in the due diligence of gratifying success.

Therein lay the difference between seeing people in life that are determined to succeed, but completely reject the idea that failing has none if any place in determining what measure of success is. Failure becomes their fear in a situation, whereas one's own worst enemy.