If you deny the existence of god then God's existence isn't finite. That is what Lebniz is affirming. He is not saying that god exists. What it is he implies: is that if you deny God's existence you are qualifying the existence of god. Whether or not yor believe it, is in and of itself another matter entirely. If we diaqualify the existence of god and if god is true to nature, the norm is a question. Not god. But god is a question of identity. Not (god) as something we are certain of. I think I am making sense, here.
Re: marx
I believe that religion serves me. It is ironic that Marx wouldn't think that. Instead, he is telling us that religion is some facade. Which is ironic (as I mentioned) because religion can be learned. Relgion is not to be taught as a metaphor for real life. You can unlearn or object to everything if a flawed or false representation of what we see is the human condition.
Marco Almeida 2025
-The Peg
But what if I told you, that god exists. God exists because god told me. If god doesn't exist it's because I told you. Therein lays the foundation for a universal false dichotomy. God can never exist. Right? However, if god does not exist, than god will only exist as a man made concept which "god can never exist."
Explanation:
The mind emits god induced ridicule that exists in the mind only. Therefore, god is to be ridiculed only. This is as Leibniz stated on both sides.
Marco Almeida ©️ 2025
-the peg
No comments:
Post a Comment