Opposition [the debonaire of utilitarianism]

October 4, 2013 ·

 Do something people - read it a few times - look for the words in how I apply them to understand it.

"Utilitarianism is the act combined with the source that each individual is not zero-tolerant of what entitlement they have independently. Therefore, they act toward a source of a problem with the same goal in mind based on the same admission." - Marco Almeida, 2013

This is the best definition of Utilitarian philosophy that I created.^ Some clown made fun of my facebook entries by saying fuck you over confrontation I welcome. The utilitarian wins every time. Think about that.

==================

I believe there is irony in everything.

====

It is the only way to make sense of what we are faced with when examining things from an utilitarian perspective.

====

You must expect that in something no matter 1- its objectivity or lack thereof you are 2- aware of how that other half acts 3- is direct in its response 4 - though not impartial.  This is how utilitariansim works.

==== 

What I feel for myself better enables the intentions of others that would not otherwise 'care'. (Keep this in mind as to the conclusion of this narrative.) The archetype is easy to identify. However, utilitarianism is often confused with the premise that if you are inclined to commit to something in a typically pragmatic manner, your expectation rests in conforming a kind of incestuous nature. This means that the expectation if someone were to rape another person, that utilitarianism predicates the fact you have willingly enabled such an act. In such a definition of utilitarianism, you are justified in expectation that the other person is complacent. That is of course, as I argue, the falsification of what utilitarianism truly entails is misrepresented as an idea of extortion. Person 'x' is doing something that must be satisfied by person 'y' = this is not utilitiarianism but is exponentially classified as.

====

Utilitarianism is the act combined with the source that each individual is not zero-tolerant of what entitlement they have independently. Therefore, they act toward a source of a problem with the same goal in mind based on the same admission.

====

In all of this, beautification is the result of true utilitarian perspective. It helps to identify the real cause of it as a partnership whereas one sided it may be. The utilitarian model should not be decimated but a condemnation of intercepting how the same idea is not to disable it. For example: if my life depended on being a charity case, does this also mean I expect the world to cater to my needs. I would answer the ability to 'care' is much more appropriate a term when looking to an unstable kind of world we live in. The utilitarian perspective is present in everything we do as result.

==================

This is a very important disparity to consider: Utilitarianism is very powerful, but it is negated because of the impervious view that if an utilitarian has the intention to be altruistic, this also means they can defile their victim in a case such as rape. The point of utilitarianism is not that you are enabling for the sake of utilitarian motives - but that your INTENTION is the one in the same thing.

Please read this entry carefully - you might learn something. It has urgency in the language when you see the true nature of utilitarianism. I make an anti-thesis to prove the validity of its main purpose with respect to the classic debunking, "Utilitarians are so typical, they think they can enact something such as incest and think that is okay." My point is that utilitarians have to INVOKE the intention of others that might want to put you at a disadvantage.

If you learn how to identify true utilitarian principles, this is invaluable to you.

------------------------

"The utilitarian model should not be decimated but a condemnation of intercepting how the same idea is not to disable it." - Marco Almeida, 2013

You as an utilitarian is not subject to perjury based on another persons intentions. The act of utilitarianism is to inform you from any liability as something passive. Nihilists would argue that as an utilitarian you are in breach of your being passive. Nihilists are anti-utilitarian.