October 3rd 2014
I hardly write to amuse the most typical of minds.
Read it.
MA
---------------
I have a presupposition, I have no idea where it is coming from or why it is there.
I feel almost paralyzed in it.
The one thing that polarizes the human condition most, is how quick to double cross my very real standards of a romantic nature. An 'enemy' will disable this as though striking bow and arrow onto its target, strictly motivated in a condescending manner.
I am determined to lead by example, this cause of which culture lacks - has created.
Here are a few examples of what justifies my reasons for explaining romance as a fundamental human element for survival:
Planet of the Apes is Darwinism explained. What about unexplainable phenomenon. If something completely eradicates his theory.
I like Darwinism & everything, but I have trouble with the survival of the species argument. Rather than natural selection, why not random.
Am I suppose to believe there were Schizophrenic apes marching about, without the help of its own species.
==============
The true value of freedom is simple, no matter how much money a person makes, how you express ideas re; change is more important.
====================
Re; romance
If Darwinism explains the origin of the species through natural selection, this must follow our closest relative primate. Therefore, if we follow Darwinist thought, its thesis ultimately recognizes, only the survival of the species according to the evolution of that specific species.
What that logic follows, draws our only emphasis to reveal how economic retribution in a capitalist class system creates our environment through rules and regulations in a class conscious societal level. Therefore, we acquire wealth as a means of which we as a species enable our own survival, WITHOUT ethically motivated RESULT. In that realm of thinking, we are legitimate aggressors in participating within a framework of ethnocentric ideologies which either make us compatible as a species or else it does not compute. This equates to warfare as an industrialized mechanical network, where competition is a choice being made by conscious beings, with regard to sentient living things.
Romance is lost.
This is where I find it, as an anti-thesis to the dominant alpha-beta-delta view of life.
I feel almost paralyzed in it.
The one thing that polarizes the human condition most, is how quick to double cross my very real standards of a romantic nature. An 'enemy' will disable this as though striking bow and arrow onto its target, strictly motivated in a condescending manner.
I am determined to lead by example, this cause of which culture lacks - has created.
Here are a few examples of what justifies my reasons for explaining romance as a fundamental human element for survival:
Planet of the Apes is Darwinism explained. What about unexplainable phenomenon. If something completely eradicates his theory.
I like Darwinism & everything, but I have trouble with the survival of the species argument. Rather than natural selection, why not random.
Am I suppose to believe there were Schizophrenic apes marching about, without the help of its own species.
==============
The true value of freedom is simple, no matter how much money a person makes, how you express ideas re; change is more important.
====================
Re; romance
If Darwinism explains the origin of the species through natural selection, this must follow our closest relative primate. Therefore, if we follow Darwinist thought, its thesis ultimately recognizes, only the survival of the species according to the evolution of that specific species.
What that logic follows, draws our only emphasis to reveal how economic retribution in a capitalist class system creates our environment through rules and regulations in a class conscious societal level. Therefore, we acquire wealth as a means of which we as a species enable our own survival, WITHOUT ethically motivated RESULT. In that realm of thinking, we are legitimate aggressors in participating within a framework of ethnocentric ideologies which either make us compatible as a species or else it does not compute. This equates to warfare as an industrialized mechanical network, where competition is a choice being made by conscious beings, with regard to sentient living things.
Romance is lost.
This is where I find it, as an anti-thesis to the dominant alpha-beta-delta view of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment