Epistemological equity

I think Trump is the least charismatic unreal untrustworthy scoundrel that anyone supporting him typically associate themselves as criminals who have the right to vote. The constitution of the 🇺🇸 are amendments not rights.

This means people that characterize themselves as equal toward others care about their rights of each individual. Whereas amendments allow for bureaucratic alternatives through a scope of provisions that only project sovereignty onto its populous.

Not necessarily to uphold your right under law as equals. That is a huge discrepancy according to how people behave and conduct themselves under a constitution made of amendments. Therefore, it is flawed. Amendments are NOT classified as rights which are protected under laws are.

The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms give a guarantee that should each individual have rights they are held as equals where you can act as a free individual. The amendments of the US constitution has no such thing and limits or contradicts your understanding of basic rights.

It is because of this contradiction that US bases its laws insofar as it dissents.

There is a good argument to be had in favor of Canada's model to a constitution which was drafted under Pierre Trudeau's watchful eye. It is singlehandedly the most visionary piece of working laws that motivate the human condition. Conservatives and Republicans are the same.

Democrats in the 🇺🇸 are basically liberal minddd individuals incubated into a bad model known as amendments. Democrats fight for your freedom to choose. Republicans fight to maintain status quo on no uncertain terms. In other words they take advantage of what the weak can't have.

Amendments of the 🇺🇸 constitution was drafted so not to displace the powers that be so they can act according to wealth as opposed to virtue.


Happiness is not a virtue nor is it a choice made according popular belief. Happiness gravitates if and only if there is a positive element that occurs. The truth of which should be regarded as equal but not equal to its basic form.

Basic happiness is a dualistic version of sovereignty. Sovereignty denotes happiness. Happiness can only occur as result of how individuals treat others as equals. Hitherto the same holds true or false on what classifies as happiness.

What can be true for you may not be true for others and vise versa. What can be true for others may not be true for you. This debatedly acquires knowledge as happiness so as if each individual is granted their free imunity to act as equals.